Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33020137›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of sports medicine2021

Subacromial decompression versus diagnostic arthroscopy for shoulder impingement: a 5-year follow-up of a randomised, placebo surgery controlled clinical trial.

Mika Paavola, Kari Kanto, Jonas Ranstam, Antti Malmivaara, Jari Inkinen, Juha Kalske, Vesa Savolainen, Ilkka Sinisaari, Simo Taimela, Teppo L Järvinen and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of sports medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07536009 ("Effectiveness of a Telerehabilitation Program Versus a Conventional Rehabilitation Program in Patients With Subacromial Pain"), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07536009 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

"Effectiveness of a Telerehabilitation Program Versus a Conventional Rehabilitation Program in Patients With Subacromial Pain"

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstituto Mexicano del Seguro SocialRan2026 to 2027Enrolled82ConditionsSubacromial Impingement SyndromeArmsDigital Physical Therapy (Telerehabilitation), Conventional Physical Therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. [The brain today is yesterday's psyche].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Tegoprazan dual and quadruple therapy forFrontiers in medicine · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Rotator cuff tears.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Mika Paavola *Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland mika.paavola@hus.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2506-2115
Kari KantoTAYS Hatanpää/Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1071-5862
Jonas RanstamMdas AB, Ystad, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8287-7273
Antti MalmivaaraCentre for Health and Social Economics - CHESS, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9042-4450
Jari InkinenFysios Finlayson, Tampere, Finland.
Juha KalskeDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1071-5862
Vesa SavolainenDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Pohjola Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Ilkka SinisaariTerveystalo Healthcare Services, Helsinki, Uusimaa, Finland.
Simo TaimelaDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6755-2983
Teppo L Järvinen *Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3713-956X
Finnish Shoulder Impingement Arthroscopy Controlled Trial (FIMPACT) Investigators
University of Helsinki · FIEtelä-Karjalan sosiaali ja terveyspiiri · FIFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare · FIHelsinki University Hospital · FIKellokoski Hospital · FILasarettet i Ystad · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess the long-term efficacy of arthroscopic subacromial decompression (ASD) by comparing it with diagnostic arthroscopy (primary comparison), a placebo surgical intervention, and with a non-operative alternative, exercise therapy (secondary comparison).

methodsWe conducted a multicentre, three group, randomised, controlled superiority trial. We included 210 patients aged 35-65 years, who had symptoms consistent with shoulder impingement syndrome for more than 3 months. 175 participants (83%) completed the 5 years follow-up. Patient enrolment began on 1 February 2005 and the 5-year follow-up was completed by 10 October 2018. The two primary outcomes were shoulder pain at rest and on arm activity measured with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Minimally important difference (MID) was set at 15. We used a mixed-model repeated measurements analysis of variance with participant as a random factor, the baseline value as a covariate and assuming a covariance structure with compound symmetry.

resultsIn the primary intention to treat analysis (ASD vs diagnostic arthroscopy), there were no between-group differences that exceeded the MID for the primary outcomes at 5 years: the mean difference between groups (ASD minus diagnostic arthroscopy) in pain VAS were -2.0 (95% CI -8.5 to 4.6; p=0.56) at rest and -8.0 (-17.3 to 1.3; p=0.093) on arm activity. There were no between-group differences in the secondary outcomes or adverse events that exceeded the MID. In our secondary comparison (ASD vs exercise therapy), the mean differences between groups (ASD minus exercise therapy) in pain VAS were 1.0 (-5.6 to 7.6; p=0.77) at rest and -3.9 (-12.8 to 5.1; p=0.40) on arm activity. There were no significant between-group differences for the secondary outcomes or adverse events.

conclusionsASD provided no benefit over diagnostic arthroscopy (or exercise therapy) at 5 years for patients with shoulder impingement syndrome.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnalysis of VarianceArthroscopyDecompression, SurgicalDouble-Blind MethodExercise TherapyFemaleFinlandFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntention to Treat AnalysisMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementShoulder Impingement Syndromeacromioplastyimpingementphysiotherapyplaceborandomisedshamshoulder

Identifiers

PMID33020137
PMCPMC7788208
OpenAlexW3091566607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.