Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33019872›Full record

ArticleJournal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners2021

Assessment of patients' understanding of and adherence to oral anticancer medication (OAM): Results of a cross-sectional institutional pilot study.

Angie Mae Rodday, Douglas Hackenyos, Raisa Masood, Nicole Savidge, Mingqian Lin, Ruth Ann Weidner, Susan K Parsons

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Perceptions of oncology healthcare professional providing care to older adults prescribed oral anticancer medications in the United States: A qualitative study.Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Enhancing patients' understanding of and adherence to oral anticancer medication: Results of a longitudinal pilot intervention.Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Angie Mae RoddayTufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8671-3401
Douglas HackenyosTufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Raisa MasoodTufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Nicole SavidgeTufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Mingqian LinTufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Ruth Ann WeidnerTufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Susan K ParsonsTufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Tufts Medical Center · US

Funding

CTSA Institutional Mentored Career Development Program (KL2)KL2TR002545 · NCATS · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI FREUND, KAREN · 2018 to 2022
$5.0M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002545
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough oral anticancer medications (OAM) provide opportunity for treatment at home, challenges include prescription filling, monitoring side effects, safe handling, and adherence. We assessed understanding of and adherence to OAM in vulnerable patients.

methodsThis 2018 pilot study defined vulnerable patients based on Chinese language, older age (≥65 years), and subsidized insurance. All participants had a cancer diagnosis and were taking an OAM filled through the hospital's specialty pharmacy. Participants reported on OAM taking (days per week, times per day, special instructions) and handling (handling, storage, disposal). The specialty pharmacist classified patient-reported responses about OAM taking and handling as adequate or inadequate. OAM regimens were classified by complexity.

resultsOf 61 eligible patients, 55 participated. Mean age was 68 years (standard deviation [SD] = 12) and 53% were female. Patient subgroups were: 27% Chinese, 64% ≥65 years, and 9% subsidized insurance. Forty-nine percent were on frontline therapy and median time on OAM was 1 year (Quartile 1 = 0.4, Quartile 3 = 1.7). Adequacy of OAM taking (30%) and handling (15%) were low; 15% had adequacy in both. Adequacy of OAM taking and handling did not vary by patient subgroup or regimen complexity. Mean patient-reported adherence was high (5.4, SD = 1, possible range 1-6) and did not vary by adequacy of OAM taking or handling.

conclusionsUnderstanding of OAM taking and handling in this group of vulnerable patients was low and did not align with patient-reported adherence. Future interventions should ensure that patients understand how to safely take and handle OAM, thereby optimizing their therapeutic potential.

Indexed as

Pharmaceutical ServicesPharmaciesAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMedication AdherencePharmacistsPilot Projectsadherencecrosssectional studydrug cost assistance programOral anti-cancer medicationvulnerable populations

Identifiers

PMID33019872
PMCPMC8021613
OpenAlexW3090657590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.