Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33019809›Full record

ArticleExperimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.)2021

Prevalence of class I-III BRAF mutations among 114,662 cancer patients in a large genomic database.

Jeff Owsley, Matthew K Stein, Jason Porter, Gino K In, Mohamed Salem, Steven O'Day, Andrew Elliott, Kelsey Poorman, Geoffrey Gibney, Ari VanderWalde

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 118 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Evidence and gaps in tumor-agnostic therapies for breast cancer: a narrative review.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2026
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Colorectal cancer tumor phenotypes associated withWorld journal of gastrointestinal pathophysiology · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Jeff OwsleyDivision of Hematology/Oncology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Germantown, TN 38138, USA.
Matthew K SteinDivision of Hematology/Oncology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Germantown, TN 38138, USA.
Jason PorterWest Cancer Center, Germantown, TN 38138, USA.
Gino K InDivision of Hematology/Oncology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.
Mohamed SalemLevine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, NC 28204, USA.
Steven O'DayJohn Wayne Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, CA 90404, USA.
Andrew ElliottCaris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ 85040, USA.
Kelsey PoormanCaris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ 85040, USA.
Geoffrey GibneyDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20007, USA.
Ari VanderWaldeDivision of Hematology/Oncology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Germantown, TN 38138, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6842-2563
University of Tennessee Health Science Center · USCaris Life Sciences (United States) · USGeorgetown University · USLevine Cancer Institute · USSaint John's Health Center · USUniversity of Southern California · USWest Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

impact statementThese data represent the largest aggregation of BRAF mutations within a single clinical database to our knowledge. The relative proportions of both BRAF V600 mutations and non-V600 mutations are informative in all cancers and by malignancy, and can serve as a definitive gold-standard for BRAF mutation cancer incidence by malignancy. The rate of BRAF mutation in human cancer in a real-world large database is lower than previously reported likely representing testing more broadly across tumor types. The relative percentages of Class II and Class III BRAF mutations are higher than previously reported, representing almost 35% of BRAF mutations in cancer. These findings provide support for the development of effective treatments for non-V600 BRAF mutations in cancer.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticHumansMutationMutation RateNeoplasmsProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafbiomarkersBRAFCancercolonkinasemelanoma

Identifiers

PMID33019809
PMCPMC7797994
OpenAlexW3089535779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.