Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33019632›Full record

ReviewPlants (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Born to Eat Wild: An Integrated Conservation Approach to Secure Wild Food Plants for Food Security and Nutrition.

Teresa Borelli, Danny Hunter, Bronwen Powell, Tiziana Ulian, Efisio Mattana, Céline Termote, Lukas Pawera, Daniela Beltrame, Daniela Penafiel, Ayfer Tan and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Teresa BorelliAlliance of Bioversity International and CIAT, via dei Tre Denari 472/a, 00054 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6405-1339
Danny HunterAlliance of Bioversity International and CIAT, via dei Tre Denari 472/a, 00054 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4267-595X
Bronwen PowellCenter for International Forestry Research, Penn State University, State College, PA 16802, USA.
Tiziana UlianRoyal Botanic Gardens Kew, Wakehurst, Ardingly, West Sussex RH17 6TN, UK.
Efisio MattanaRoyal Botanic Gardens Kew, Wakehurst, Ardingly, West Sussex RH17 6TN, UK.
Céline TermoteAlliance of Bioversity International and CIAT, via dei Tre Denari 472/a, 00054 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3217-0226
Lukas PaweraFaculty of Tropical AgriSciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 16500 Praha-Suchdol, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-8548-3491
Daniela BeltrameBiodiversity for Food and Nutrition Project, Ministry of the Environment, Brasília-DF 70068-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2989-3589
Daniela PenafielEscuela Superior Politécnica del Litoral, Centro de Investigaciones Rurales-FCSH, Campus Gustavo Galindo-km. 30.5 vía Perimetral, Guayaquil 090112, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0001-6593-8217
Ayfer TanAegean Agricultural Research Institute, Menemen, Izmir P.O. Box 9 35661, Turkey.
Mary TaylorEnvironmental Studies, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore, QLD 4556, Australia.
Johannes EngelsAlliance of Bioversity International and CIAT, via dei Tre Denari 472/a, 00054 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6256-6518

Funding

Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research HORT2014/100, GP2017/007 and GP2018/101Global Environment Facility GEF Project ID 3808Neys-van Hoogstraten Foundation IN305
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Overlooked in national reports and in conservation programs, wild food plants (WFPs) have been a vital component of food and nutrition security for centuries. Recently, several countries have reported on the widespread and regular consumption of WFPs, particularly by rural and indigenous communities but also in urban contexts. They are reported as critical for livelihood resilience and for providing essential micronutrients to people enduring food shortages or other emergency situations. However, threats derived from changes in land use and climate, overexploitation and urbanization are reducing the availability of these biological resources in the wild and contributing to the loss of traditional knowledge associated with their use. Meanwhile, few policy measures are in place explicitly targeting their conservation and sustainable use. This can be partially attributed to a lack of scientific evidence and awareness among policymakers and relevant stakeholders of the untapped potential of WFPs, accompanied by market and non-market barriers limiting their use. This paper reviews recent efforts being undertaken in several countries to build evidence of the importance of WFPs, while providing examples of cross-sectoral cooperation and multi-stakeholder approaches that are contributing to advance their conservation and sustainable use. An integrated conservation approach is proposed contributing to secure their availability for future generations.

Indexed as

conservationfood securitymulti-sectoral collaborationnutrition datapolicywild food plants

Identifiers

PMID33019632
PMCPMC7601573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.