Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33019586›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Intraspecific Variation in Nectar Chemistry and Its Implications for Insect Visitors: The Case of the Medicinal Plant,

Justyna Ryniewicz, Mateusz Skłodowski, Magdalena Chmur, Andrzej Bajguz, Katarzyna Roguz, Agata Roguz, Marcin Zych

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Sweet solutions: nectar chemistry and quality.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  9. Sugar perception in honeybees.Frontiers in physiology · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Justyna RyniewiczBotanic Garden, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, 00-478 Warsaw, Poland.
Mateusz SkłodowskiBotanic Garden, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, 00-478 Warsaw, Poland.
Magdalena ChmurDepartment of Biology and Ecology of Plants, Faculty of Biology, University of Bialystok, 15-245 Bialystok, Poland.
Andrzej BajguzDepartment of Biology and Ecology of Plants, Faculty of Biology, University of Bialystok, 15-245 Bialystok, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4275-0881
Katarzyna RoguzBotanic Garden, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, 00-478 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4159-8494
Agata RoguzFeature Forest, Trzy Lipy 3, 80-172 Gdańsk, Poland.
Marcin ZychBotanic Garden, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, 00-478 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6961-069X
University of Warsaw · PLUniversity of Białystok · PL

Funding

Narodowe Centrum Nauki 2014/15/B/NZ8/00249
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Floral nectar, being a primary reward for insect visitors, is a key factor in shaping plant-pollinator interactions. However, little is known about the variability in nectar traits, which could potentially affect pollinators and the reproduction of the species. We investigated intraspecific variation in nectar traits in 14 populations of a Red-listed plant

Indexed as

generalist speciesnectar compositionpollinationreproductive ecologyvariation in plant traits

Identifiers

PMID33019586
PMCPMC7600102
OpenAlexW3091053075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.