ArticleMedicine2020
Prenatal diagnosis of a de novo 15q11.2 microdeletion in a maternal inv(4)(p15q31) fetus with increased nuchal translucency: A case report and literature review.
Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
rationale15q11.2 microdeletion syndrome is a relatively rare chromosomal abnormality with incomplete penetrance and phenotypic variability. The reports on prenatal ultrasound abnormalities of fetus with 15q11.2 microdeletion are rare. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 30-year-old woman was referred for genetic counseling and prenatal diagnosis at 19 weeks of gestation because of increased nuchal translucency in prenatal ultrasound findings and a history of spontaneous abortion. DIAGNOSES: The cytogenetic analysis showed the karyotype of the fetus was 46,XY, inv(4)(p15q31) and chromosomal microarray analysis detected a 0.512 Mb deletion in 15q11.2 region. We recalled the parents to determine the origination of these chromosomal abnormalities.
interventionsThe pregnant woman chose to continue the pregnancies and finally delivered a healthy male infant at 39 weeks. OUTCOMES: The fetus inherited the inv(4)(p15q31) from his mother while the deletion in 15q11.2 was identified as de novo. Given the normal phenotype of the mother, it was reasonable to assume that the maternal inherited inv(4) in the fetus would not increase the risk of his abnormal phenotype. However, the pathogenicity of the microdeletion in 15q11.2 for the infant is unknown and long-term follow-up of progeny should be paid more attention. LESSONS: The combined application of traditional banding technique and molecular cytogenetic techniques can not only detect chromosomal structural abnormalities, but also identify the subchromosomal imbalances, which is beneficial to genetic counselling and would offer more guidance to prenatal diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.