ArticleMedicine2020
Huang Lian for ulcerative colitis: A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- The role of Chinese herbal medicine in the regulation of oxidative stress in treating hypertension: from therapeutics to mechanisms.Chinese medicine · 2024Review
- Network pharmacological prediction of the mechanism of action of Shen-Zhu-Lian-Bai Decoction in the treatment of ulcerative colitis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Exploring the mechanism of the Fructus Mume and Rhizoma Coptidis herb pair intervention in Ulcerative Colitis from the perspective of inflammation and immunity based on systemic pharmacology.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionUlcerative Colitis is a chronic nonspecific inflammatory disease of the colon and rectum, which is of global concern. It has the characteristics of a long course of disease and repeated attacks, which seriously affects the quality of life and economic and social development of the affected population. The treatment of UC by herb Huanglian and compound prescription contain Huanglian have been proved. However, due to the lack of evidence, there is no specific method or suggestion, it is necessary to systematically evaluate coptidis so as to provide effective evidence for further research. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The following databases will be searched from their inception to June 2020: Electronic databases included PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Nature, Science Online, WanFang China Biomedical Database, VIP Medical Information, CNKI (Knowledge Infrastructure of China). MAIN OUTCOMES: Colonoscopy, improved condition (tenesmus), stool routine. Additional outcomes: Electrocardiogram (ECG), erythrocyte (RBC), leukocyte (WBC), platelet (PLT). Data will be extracted by 2 researchers independently, risk of bias of the meta-analysis will be evaluated based on the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. All data analysis will be conducted by data statistics software Review Manager V.5.3. and Stata V.12.0.
resultsThe results of this study will systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of rhizoma coptidis intervention in patients with Ulcerative Colitis.
conclusionThrough the systematic review of this study, the published evidence of rhizoma coptidis on the treatment of UC is summarized so as to further guide its promotion and application. ETHICS AND COMMUNICATION: This study is a systematic review, the outcomes are based on the published evidence, so examination and agreement by the ethics committee are not required in this study. We intend to publish the study results in a journal or conference presentations. OPEN SCIENCE FRA MEWORK (OSF) REGISTRATION NUMBER: August 27, 2020. osf.io/7nh3k (https://osf.io/7nh3k).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.