ArticleMedicine2020
Blood neurofilament light chain in Parkinson disease and atypical parkinsonisms: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of primary copper metabolism disturbance on elemental, protein, and lipid composition of the organs in Jackson toxic milk mouse.Biometals : an international journal on the role of metal ions in biology, biochemistry, and medicine · 2025Article
- The 2022 Lady Estelle Wolfson lectureship on neurofilaments.Journal of neurochemistry · 2022Review
- News about the Role of Fluid and Imaging Biomarkers in Neurodegenerative Diseases.Biomedicines · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNeurofilament light chain (NfL), an index of neuroaxonal injury, is a promising diagnostic and prognostic fluid biomarker with high translational value in many neurodegenerative disorders. Blood NfL measurement has been an exciting and active field of research in idiopathic Parkinson disease (PD) and atypical parkinsonisms. However, blood NfL levels in these parkinsonisms from existing literature were inconsistent. No comprehensive meta-analysis has ever been conducted.
methodsThree major biomedical electronic databases PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were comprehensively searched from inception to July 10, 2020. This protocol will be prepared based on the guidelines recommended by the statement of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P). Original observational studies that measured blood (serum/plasma) NfL concentrations in patients with parkinsonisms (multiple system atrophy [MSA], progressive supranuclear palsy [PSP], corticobasal syndrome [CBS], and dementia with Lewy bodies [DLB]), and healthy controls (HCs) will be included. Quality assessment of the included studies will be performed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS). Meta-analyses will be conducted using the STATA software version 13.0. The standardized mean differences as the measure of effect size and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for each comparison of blood NfL levels. Heterogeneity analysis, sensitivity analysis, publication bias, subgroup analysis, and meta-regression analysis will be carried out to test the robustness of the results.
resultsThe meta-analysis will obtain the effect sizes of blood NfL levels in the following comparisons: PD versus HC, MSA versus HC, PSP versus HC, CBS versus HC, DLB versus HC, MSA versus PD, PSP versus PD, CBS versus PD, and DLB versus PD.
conclusionsThe present meta-analysis will provide the quantitative evidence of NfL levels in idiopathic PD and atypical parkinsonisms, hoping to facilitate differential diagnoses in clinical practice. REGISTRATION NUMBER: INPLASY202070091.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.