Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33019155›Full record

ArticleAnnual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference2020

Device Configuration and Patient's Body Composition Significantly Affect RF Heating of Deep Brain Stimulation Implants During MRI: An Experimental Study at 1.5T and 3T.

Bhumi Bhusal, Bach T Nguyen, Jasmine Vu, Behzad Elahi, Joshua Rosenow, Mark J Nolt, Julie Pilitsis, Marisa DiMarzio, Laleh Golestanirad

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. TJournal of biomedical physics & engineering · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bhumi Bhusal
Bach T Nguyen
Jasmine Vu
Behzad Elahi
Joshua Rosenow
Mark J Nolt
Julie Pilitsis
Marisa DiMarzio
Laleh Golestanirad
Northwestern University · USAlbany Medical Center Hospital · US

Funding

Patient-adjustable MRI technology for high-resolution imaging of deep brain stimulationR00EB021320 · NIBIB · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI GOLESTANI RAD, LALEH · 2018 to 2020
$733k
Safety assessment of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with retained cardiac leadsR03EB025344 · NIBIB · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI GOLESTANI RAD, LALEH · 2018 to 2019
$156k
NIBIB NIH HHS R00 EB021320NIBIB NIH HHS R03 EB025344
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with deep brain stimulation (DBS) devices have limited access to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) due to safety concerns associated with RF heating generated around the implant. The problem of predicting RF heating of conductive leads is complex with a large parameter space and several interplaying factors. Recently however, off-label use of MRI in patients with DBS devices has been reported based on limited safety assessments, raising the concern that potentially dangerous scenarios may have been overlooked. In this work, we present results of a systematic assessment of RF heating of a commercial DBS device during MRI at 1.5T and 3T, taking into account the effect of device configuration, imaging landmark, and patient's body composition. Ninety-six (96) RF heating measurements were performed using anthropomorphic phantoms implanted with a full DBS system. We evaluated eight clinically relevant device configurations, implanted in phantoms with different material compositions, and imaged at three different landmarks (head, shoulder, and lower chest) in 1.5 T and 3T scanners. We observed a substantial fluctuation in the RF heating depending on phantom's composition and device configuration. RF heating in the brain-mimicking gel varied from 0.1°C to 12°C during 1.5 T MRI and from <0.1°C to 4.5°C during 3T MRI. We also observed that certain device configurations consistently reduced RF heating across different phantom compositions, imaging landmarks, and MRI transmit frequencies.

Indexed as

Deep Brain StimulationHeatingBody CompositionHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingProstheses and Implants

Identifiers

PMID33019155
PMCPMC10900233
OpenAlexW3081753678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.