Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33018768›Full record

ArticleAnnual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference2020

A microfluidic system integrated with shape memory alloy valves for a safe direct current delivery system.

C Cheng, F P Aplin, G Y Fridman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

C Cheng
F P Aplin
G Y Fridman

Funding

Modulation of the Vestibular System Using Prosthetic Direct Current StimulationR01DC018300 · NIDCD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FRIDMAN, GENE YEVGENY · 2021 to 2025
$2.8M
Safe Direct Current Stimulator (SDCS) technology for blocking chronicperipheral painR01NS110893 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FRIDMAN, GENE YEVGENY · 2020 to 2023
$2.2M
Safe Direct Current for Neuroprosthetic ApplicationsR01NS092726 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FRIDMAN, GENE YEVGENY · 2015 to 2019
$1.7M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC018300NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS092726NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS110893
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Direct current (DC) has potential as a clinical and scientific tool to accelerate wound healing, increase the permeability of the skin to drug treatment and modulate neural activity. But long duration delivery of DC unavoidably causes hazardous electrolysis at the tissue-electrode interface. To be able to deliver long duration DC, we previously proposed a design for a safe direct current stimulator (SDCS). This device uses alternating current that does not cause chemical reactions at the metal electrodes within the device, but delivers ionic direct current output to the tissue via microfluidic valves. We previously developed and published designs of multiple SDCS components including microfluidic, electronic, data processing, and energy systems. In this paper we focus on the development of the integrated microfluidics needed by the SDCS system. We developed a fabrication method and characterized valve performance within the multi-valve microfluidic system. We used poly-dimethylsiloxane (PDMS) to fabricate three microfluidic chips that integrated valves actuated by 50-µm Nitinol (NiTi) shape memory alloy (SMA) wire. We tested system operation by driving SMA valves with a current pulse and recording the valve response with an electrical assay. The valve operation complied with the SDCS system requirements. The time for valves to open was rapid at 0.177 ± 0.04 seconds, and the time for the valves to close was 0.265 ± 0.05 seconds. Open microfluidic channel impedance for unrestricted ionic current flow was 15.90 ± 8.28 kΩ and it increased by a factor of 40 to restrict ionic current flow at 678 ± 102 kΩ for the closed valves.

Indexed as

MicrofluidicsShape Memory AlloysElectrodesEquipment DesignShape Memory Alloys

Identifiers

PMID33018768
PMCPMC12302988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.