Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33018620›Full record

ArticleAnnual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference2020

Predicting Response of Spontaneously Firing Afferents to Prosthetic Pulsatile Stimulation.

Cynthia R Steinhardt, Gene Y Fridman

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Difference in Network Effects of Pulsatile and Galvanic Stimulation.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2022
    Article
  3. A Machine Learning-based Neural Implant Front End for Inducing Naturalistic Firing.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cynthia R Steinhardt
Gene Y Fridman
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Modulation of the Vestibular System Using Prosthetic Direct Current StimulationR01DC018300 · NIDCD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FRIDMAN, GENE YEVGENY · 2021 to 2025
$2.8M
Safe Direct Current for Neuroprosthetic ApplicationsR01NS092726 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FRIDMAN, GENE YEVGENY · 2015 to 2019
$1.7M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC018300NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS092726
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pulsatile electrical stimulation is used in neural prostheses such as the vestibular prosthesis. In a healthy vestibular system, head motion is encoded by changes in the firing rates of afferents around their spontaneous baseline rate. For people suffering from bilateral vestibular disorder (BVD), head motion no longer modulates firing rate. Vestibular prostheses use a gyroscope to detect head motion and stimulate neurons directly in a way that mimics natural modulation. Proper restoration of vestibular function relies on the ability of stimulation to evoke the same firing patterns as the healthy system. For this reason, it is necessary to understand what firing rates are produced for different stimulation parameters. Two stimulation parameters commonly controlled in pulsatile neuromodulation are pulse rate and pulse amplitude. Previous neural recording experiments in the vestibular nerve contradict widely held assumptions about the relationship between pulse rates and evoked spike activity, and the relationship between pulse amplitude and neural activity has not been explored. Here we use a well-established computational model of the vestibular afferent to simulate responses to different pulse rates and amplitudes. We confirm that our simulated neural results agree with the existing experimental data. Finally, we developed the "Action Potential Collision" (APC) equation that defines induced firing as a function of spontaneous firing rate, pulse rate, and pulse amplitude. We show that this relationship can successfully predict simulated vestibular activity by accounting for interactions between pulses and spontaneous firing.

Indexed as

Neural ProsthesesVestibular DiseasesVestibule, LabyrinthElectric StimulationHumansVestibular Nerve

Identifiers

PMID33018620
PMCPMC12308641
OpenAlexW3081966706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.