Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33018466›Full record

ArticleAnnual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference2020

Non-invasive Prediction of Peak Systolic Pressure Drop across Coarctation of Aorta using Computational Fluid Dynamics.

Seda Aslan, Paige Mass, Yue-Hin Loke, Linnea Warburton, Xiaolong Liu, Narutoshi Hibino, Laura Olivieri, Axel Krieger

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Applications of Computational Fluid Dynamics in Congenital Heart Disease: A Review.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Virtual Planning and Patient-Specific Graft Design for Aortic Repairs.Cardiovascular engineering and technology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Seda Aslan
Paige Mass
Yue-Hin Loke
Linnea Warburton
Xiaolong Liu
Narutoshi Hibino
Laura Olivieri
Axel Krieger
University of Maryland, College Park · USChildren's National · USUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

Patient specific 3D printed tissue engineered vascular graft for aortic reconstruction designed by artificial intelligence algorithm.R01HL143468 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI FUGE, MARK, HIBINO, NARUTOSHI · 2018 to 2021
$2.7M
Patient Specific Tissue Engineered Vascular Graft Creation Using 3D Printing TechnologyR21HD090671 · NICHD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI HIBINO, NARUTOSHI, KRIEGER, AXEL · 2017 to 2018
$484k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL143468NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD090671
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper proposes a novel method to noninvasively measure the peak systolic pressure difference (PSPD) across coarctation of the aorta for diagnosing the severity of coarctation. Traditional non-invasive estimates of pressure drop from the ultrasound can underestimate the severity and invasive measurements by cardiac catheterization can carry risks for patients. To address the issues, we employ computational fluid dynamics (CFD) computation to accurately predict the PSPD across a coarctation based on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging data and cuff pressure measurements from one arm. The boundary conditions of a patient-specific aorta model are specified at the inlet of the ascending aorta by using the time-dependent blood velocity, and the outlets of descending aorta and supra aortic branches by using a 3-element Windkessel model. To estimate the parameters of the Windkessel model, steady flow simulations were performed using the time-averaged flow rates in the ascending aorta, descending aorta, and two of the three supra aortic branches. The mean cuff pressure from one arm was specified at the outlet of one of the supra aortic branches. The CFD predicted PSPDs of 5 patients (n=5) were compared with the invasively measured pressure drops obtained by catheterization. The PSPDs were accurately predicted (mean µ=0.3mmHg, standard deviation σ =4.3mmHg) in coarctation of the aorta using completely non-invasive flow and cuff pressure data. The results of our study indicate that the proposed method could potentially replace invasive measurements for estimating the severity of coarctations.Clinical relevance-Peak systolic pressure drop is an indicator of the severity of coarctation of the aorta. It can be predicted without any additional risks to patients using non-invasive cuff pressure and flow data from CMR.

Indexed as

Aortic CoarctationAortaBlood Flow VelocityBlood PressureHumansHydrodynamics

Identifiers

PMID33018466
PMCPMC7878067
OpenAlexW3082258367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.