Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33018367›Full record

ArticleAnnual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference2020

Super-resolution technology to simultaneously improve optical & digital resolution of optical coherence tomography via deep learning.

Shengting Cao, Xinwen Yao, Nischal Koirala, Brigitta Brott, Silvio Litovsky, Yuye Ling, Yu Gan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. High-resolutionBiomedical optics express · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Shengting Cao
Xinwen Yao
Nischal Koirala
Brigitta Brott
Silvio Litovsky
Yuye Ling
Yu Gan
University of Alabama · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USNanyang Technological University · SGShanghai Jiao Tong University · CN

Funding

National Dissemination of I-Corps@NCATS: Accelerating Translation through CommercializationUL1TR003096 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI GUTIERREZ, ORLANDO M, KIMBERLY, ROBERT P. · 2019 to 2023
$43.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003096
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) has stimulated a wide range of medical image-based diagnosis and treatment. In cardiac imaging, OCT has been used in assessing plaques before and after stenting. While needed in many scenarios, high resolution comes at the costs of demanding optical design and data storage/transmission. In OCT, there are two types of resolutions to characterize image quality: optical and digital resolutions. Although multiple existing works have heavily emphasized on improving the digital resolution, the studies on improving optical resolution or both resolutions remain scarce. In this paper, we focus on improving both resolutions. In particular, we investigate a deep learning method to address the problem of generating a high-resolution (HR) OCT image from a low optical and low digital resolution (L

Indexed as

Deep LearningTomography, Optical CoherenceHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID33018367
PMCPMC8116943
OpenAlexW3082078635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.