ArticleAnnual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference2020
Regularized Estimation of Effective Scatterer Size and Acoustic Concentration Quantitative Ultrasound Parameters Using Dynamic Programming
Article in Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Simulation of ultrasonic scattering from scatterer size distributions using Field II.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2024Article
- Robust Scatterer Number Density Segmentation of Ultrasound Images.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2022Article
- Analytic Global Regularized Backscatter Quantitative Ultrasound.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The objective of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) is to characterize tissue microstructure by parametrizing backscattered radiofrequency (RF) signals from clinical ultrasound scanners. Herein, we develop a novel technique based on dynamic programming (DP) to simultaneously estimate the acoustic attenuation, the effective scatterer size (ESS), and the acoustic concentration (AC) from ultrasound backscattered power spectra. This is achieved through two different approaches: (1) using a Gaussian form factor (GFF) and (2) using a general form factor (gFF) that is more flexible than the Gaussian form factor but involves estimating more parameters. Both DP methods are compared to an adaptation of a previously proposed least-squares (LSQ) method. Simulation results show that in the GFF approach, the variance of DP is on average 88%, 75% and 32% lower than that of LSQ for the three estimated QUS parameters. The gFF approach also yields similar improvements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.