ArticleInternational neurourology journal2020
Evaluation of YouTube Videos Regarding Clean Intermittent Catheterization Application.
Article in International neurourology journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analysis of the YouTube videos on intracavernosal injection in terms of their comprehensiveness, reliability and quality.International journal of impotence research · 2026Article
- Current Status of Clean Intermittent Catheterization Education in South Korea.International neurourology journal · 2025Article
- Analysis of Youtube Videos for Artificial Airway Suctioning Training of Nurses: A Content Analysis.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Videos Related to Vaginal Cone Usage on YouTube as an Online Information Source.International urogynecology journal · 2024Article
- Suprapubic catheter change: Evaluating YouTube videos as a resource for teaching junior doctors.BJUI compass · 2024Article
- Insights Into Korean Public Perspectives on Urology: Online News Data Analytics Through Latent Dirichlet Allocation Topic Modeling.International neurourology journal · 2023Article
- Analysis of YouTube videos as a source of information for myocarditis during the COVID-19 pandemic.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2022Article
- YouTube videos as a source of information concerning Behçet's disease: a reliability and quality analysis.Rheumatology international · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study was to assess the clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) training and education videos on YouTube.
methodsThis study was conducted in English language in descriptive type to evaluate the content, reliability, and quality of Internet videos related to CIC training. The search was performed by using term "clean intermittent catheterization" and "intermittent self catheterization" on YouTube in August 2019. The content of the selected videos was analyzed by 2 independent experts in the field. The DISCERN questionnaire was used to analyze the reliability of the video and the global quality score (GQS) was used for the quality of the video.
resultsWhen the contents of the 64 videos included in the study were examined, it was found that 41 of them contained useful information and 23 of them contained misleading information. DISCERN scores, video coverage scores, and GQS of videos with useful information were found to be statistically higher than those with misleading information (P<0.001). When the sources of the videos were examined, it was seen that 78.05% of the videos containing useful information were published by medical advertisement/for-profit companies (P<0.001). The reliability scores, coverage scores, and GQS of the videos from medical advertisement/for-profit companies were significantly higher than the other sources (P<0.001).
conclusionIn this study, it was seen that the majority of YouTube CIC training videos examined within the scope of the research were published by medical advertisement/for-profit companies and most of these videos contain useful information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.