Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33017724›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of medical informatics2020

Successfully implementing a national electronic health record: a rapid umbrella review.

Orna Fennelly, Caitriona Cunningham, Loretto Grogan, Heather Cronin, Conor O'Shea, Miriam Roche, Fiona Lawlor, Neil O'Hare

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of medical informatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Orna FennellyInsight Centre for Data Analytics, University College Dublin, Ireland; School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Ireland. Electronic address: orna.fennelly@ucdconnect.ie.
Caitriona CunninghamSchool of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Ireland. Electronic address: caitriona.g.cunningham@ucd.ie.
Loretto GroganOffice of the Nursing and Midwifery Services Director, Health Service Executive (HSE), Ireland. Electronic address: loretto.grogan1@hse.ie.
Heather CroninNational Rehabilitation Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. Electronic address: Heather.Cronin@nrh.ie.
Conor O'SheaIrish College of General Practitioners, Ireland.. Electronic address: conoshea@gmail.com.
Miriam RocheMaternal and Newborn Clinical Management System National Project Team, HSE, Ireland. Electronic address: mroche@stjames.ie.
Fiona LawlorSt. James' Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. Electronic address: fiona.lawlor@hse.ie.
Neil O'HareSchool of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Ireland; Ireland East Hospital Group, HSE, Ireland. Electronic address: neil.ohare@ucd.ie.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo summarize the findings from literature reviews with a view to identifying and exploring the key factors which impact on the success of an EHR implementation across different healthcare contexts.

introductionDespite the widely recognised benefits of electronic health records (EHRs), their full potential has not always been achieved, often as a consequence of the implementation process. As more countries launch national EHR programmes, it is critical that the most up-to-date and relevant international learnings are shared with key stakeholders.

methodsA rapid umbrella review was undertaken in collaboration with a multidisciplinary panel of knowledge-users and experts from Ireland. A comprehensive literature review was completed (2019) across several search engines (PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library, ProQuest, Cochrane) and Gray literature. Identified studies (n = 5,040) were subject to eligibility criterion and identified barriers and facilitators were analysed, reviewed, discussed and interpreted by the expert panel.

resultsTwenty-seven literature reviews were identified which captured the key organizational, human and technological factors for a successful EHR implementation according to various stakeholders across different settings. Although the size, type and culture of the healthcare setting impacted on the organizational factors, each was deemed important for EHR success; Governance, leadership and culture, End-user involvement, Training, Support, Resourcing, and Workflows. As well as organizational differences, individual end-users have varying Skills and characteristics, Perceived benefits and incentives, and Perceived changes to the health ecosystem which were also critical to success. Finally, the success of the EHR technology depended on Usability, Interoperability, Adaptability, Infrastructure, Regulation, standards and policies, and Testing.

conclusionFifteen inter-linked organizational, human and technological factors emerged as important for successful EHR implementations across primary, secondary and long-term care settings. In determining how to employ these factors, the local context, individual end-users and advancing technology must also be considered.

Indexed as

EcosystemElectronic Health RecordsHumansIrelandLong-Term CareElectronic Health RecordElectronic Medical RecordImplementationReview

Identifiers

PMID33017724
PMCPMC7510429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.