Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33017644›Full record

ReviewJournal of neuroscience methods2021

The sensitivity of diffusion MRI to microstructural properties and experimental factors.

Maryam Afzali, Tomasz Pieciak, Sharlene Newman, Eleftherios Garyfallidis, Evren Özarslan, Hu Cheng, Derek K Jones

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.

Maryam AfzaliCardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom. Electronic address: AfzaliDeliganiM@cardiff.ac.uk.
Tomasz PieciakAGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland; LPI, ETSI Telecomunicación, Universidad de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain. Electronic address: tpieciak@gmail.com.
Sharlene NewmanDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA; Program of Neuroscience, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA. Electronic address: sdnewman@indiana.edu.
Eleftherios GaryfallidisProgram of Neuroscience, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA; Department of Intelligent Systems Engineering, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47408, USA. Electronic address: elef@indiana.edu.
Evren ÖzarslanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden; Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. Electronic address: evren.ozarslan@liu.se.
Hu ChengDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA; Program of Neuroscience, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA. Electronic address: hucheng@indiana.edu.
Derek K JonesCardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom. Electronic address: JonesD27@cardiff.ac.uk.
Indiana University Bloomington · USCardiff University · GBLinköping University · SEUniversidad de Valladolid · ES

Funding

CRCNS: Community-supported open-source software for computational neuroanatomyR01EB027585 · NIBIB · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI Eleftherios Garyfallidis · 2018 to 2026
$2.6M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB027585Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 096646/Z/11/ZWellcome Trust 104943/Z/14/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diffusion MRI is a non-invasive technique to study brain microstructure. Differences in the microstructural properties of tissue, including size and anisotropy, can be represented in the signal if the appropriate method of acquisition is used. However, to depict the underlying properties, special care must be taken when designing the acquisition protocol as any changes in the procedure might impact on quantitative measurements. This work reviews state-of-the-art methods for studying brain microstructure using diffusion MRI and their sensitivity to microstructural differences and various experimental factors. Microstructural properties of the tissue at a micrometer scale can be linked to the diffusion signal at a millimeter-scale using modeling. In this paper, we first give an introduction to diffusion MRI and different encoding schemes. Then, signal representation-based methods and multi-compartment models are explained briefly. The sensitivity of the diffusion MRI signal to the microstructural components and the effects of curvedness of axonal trajectories on the diffusion signal are reviewed. Factors that impact on the quality (accuracy and precision) of derived metrics are then reviewed, including the impact of random noise, and variations in the acquisition parameters (i.e., number of sampled signals, b-value and number of acquisition shells). Finally, yet importantly, typical approaches to deal with experimental factors are depicted, including unbiased measures and harmonization. We conclude the review with some future directions and recommendations on this topic.

Indexed as

BrainDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingAnisotropyAxonsDiffusionAnisotropyBiophysical modelDiffusion MRIExperimental factorsMicrostructureSignal representation

Identifiers

PMID33017644
PMCPMC7762827
OpenAlexW3089488895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.