Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33017420›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2020

Mathematical model predicts response to chemotherapy in advanced non-resectable non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with platinum-based doublet.

Emilia Kozłowska, Rafał Suwiński, Monika Giglok, Andrzej Świerniak, Marek Kimmel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Knowledge-Informed Machine Learning for Cancer Diagnosis and Prognosis: A Review.IEEE transactions on automation science and engineering : a publication of the IEEE Robotics and Automation Society · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Normalizing tumor microenvironment with nanomedicine and metronomic therapy to improve immunotherapy.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Emilia KozłowskaDepartment of Systems Biology and Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Akademicka Gliwice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3069-3085
Rafał SuwińskiThe 2nd Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy Clinic, M. Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Gliwice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3895-7938
Monika GiglokThe 2nd Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy Clinic, M. Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Gliwice, Poland.
Andrzej ŚwierniakDepartment of Systems Biology and Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Akademicka Gliwice, Poland.
Marek KimmelDepartment of Systems Biology and Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Akademicka Gliwice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8161-890X
Silesian University of Technology · PLThe Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We developed a computational platform including machine learning and a mechanistic mathematical model to find the optimal protocol for administration of platinum-doublet chemotherapy in a palliative setting. The platform has been applied to advanced metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The 42 NSCLC patients treated with palliative intent at Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, were collected from a retrospective cohort of patients diagnosed in 2004-2014. Patients were followed-up, for three years. Clinical data collected include complete information about the clinical course of the patients including treatment schedule, response according to RECIST classification, and survival. The core of the platform is the mathematical model, in the form of a system of ordinary differential equations, describing dynamics of platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant cancer cells and interactions reflecting competition for space and resources. The model is simulated stochastically by sampling the parameter values from a joint probability distribution function. The machine learning model is applied to calibrate the mathematical model and to fit it to the overall survival curve. The model simulations faithfully reproduce the clinical cohort at three levels long-term response (OS), the initial response (according to RECIST criteria), and the relationship between the number of chemotherapy cycles and time between two consecutive chemotherapy cycles. In addition, we investigated the relationship between initial and long-term response. We showed that those two variables do not correlate which means that we cannot predict patient survival solely based on the initial response. We also tested several chemotherapy schedules to find the best one for patients treated with palliative intent. We found that the optimal treatment schedule depends, among others, on the strength of competition among various subclones in a tumor. The computational platform developed allows optimizing chemotherapy protocols, within admissible limits of toxicity, for palliative treatment of metastatic NSCLC. The simplicity of the method allows its application to chemotherapy optimization in different cancers.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsModels, BiologicalAgedAlgorithmsAntineoplastic AgentsComputational BiologyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPlatinum CompoundsRetrospective StudiesAntineoplastic AgentsPlatinum Compounds

Identifiers

PMID33017420
PMCPMC7561182
OpenAlexW3089860158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.