Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33017414›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Network theory of the bacterial ribosome.

Laurie E Calvet, Serhii Matviienko, Pierre Ducluzaux

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Ribosomes: The New Role of Ribosomal Proteins as Natural Antimicrobials.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Laurie E CalvetCNRS, Centre de Nanosciences et Nanotechnologies, Université Paris-Saclay, Palaiseau, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9946-1971
Serhii MatviienkoCNRS, Centre de Nanosciences et Nanotechnologies, Université Paris-Saclay, Palaiseau, France.
Pierre DucluzauxCNRS, Centre de Nanosciences et Nanotechnologies, Université Paris-Saclay, Palaiseau, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2832-5320

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the past two decades, research into the biochemical, biophysical and structural properties of the ribosome have revealed many different steps of protein translation. Nevertheless, a complete understanding of how they lead to a rapid and accurate protein synthesis still remains a challenge. Here we consider a coarse network analysis in the bacterial ribosome formed by the connectivity between ribosomal (r) proteins and RNAs at different stages in the elongation cycle. The ribosomal networks are found to be dis-assortative and small world, implying that the structure allows for an efficient exchange of information between distant locations. An analysis of centrality shows that the second and fifth domains of 23S rRNA are the most important elements in all of the networks. Ribosomal protein hubs connect to much fewer nodes but are shown to provide important connectivity within the network (high closeness centrality). A modularity analysis reveals some of the different functional communities, indicating some known and some new possible communication pathways Our mathematical results confirm important communication pathways that have been discussed in previous research, thus verifying the use of this technique for representing the ribosome, and also reveal new insights into the collective function of ribosomal elements.

Indexed as

BacteriaComputational BiologyGene Regulatory NetworksProtein BiosynthesisRibosomal ProteinsRibosomesRNA, Ribosomal, 23STranscription Elongation, GeneticRibosomal ProteinsRNA, Ribosomal, 23S

Identifiers

PMID33017414
PMCPMC7535068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.