ArticlePloS one2020
Network theory of the bacterial ribosome.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- In silico interactome analysis reveals distinct and complementary metabolic roles of bacteria in stingless bee larval food.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Ribosomes: The New Role of Ribosomal Proteins as Natural Antimicrobials.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Modeling the ribosome as a bipartite graph.PloS one · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the past two decades, research into the biochemical, biophysical and structural properties of the ribosome have revealed many different steps of protein translation. Nevertheless, a complete understanding of how they lead to a rapid and accurate protein synthesis still remains a challenge. Here we consider a coarse network analysis in the bacterial ribosome formed by the connectivity between ribosomal (r) proteins and RNAs at different stages in the elongation cycle. The ribosomal networks are found to be dis-assortative and small world, implying that the structure allows for an efficient exchange of information between distant locations. An analysis of centrality shows that the second and fifth domains of 23S rRNA are the most important elements in all of the networks. Ribosomal protein hubs connect to much fewer nodes but are shown to provide important connectivity within the network (high closeness centrality). A modularity analysis reveals some of the different functional communities, indicating some known and some new possible communication pathways Our mathematical results confirm important communication pathways that have been discussed in previous research, thus verifying the use of this technique for representing the ribosome, and also reveal new insights into the collective function of ribosomal elements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.