Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33017405›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Genetic characterization for lesion mimic and other traits in relation to spot blotch resistance in spring wheat.

Shweta Singh, Vinod Kumar Mishra, Ravindra Nath Kharwar, Neeraj Budhlakoti, Ram Narayan Ahirwar, Dwijesh Chandra Mishra, Sundeep Kumar, Ramesh Chand, Uttam Kumar, Suneel Kumar and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Shweta SinghDepartment of Botany, Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.ORCID 0000-0003-2683-177X
Vinod Kumar MishraDepartment of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3068-1199
Ravindra Nath KharwarDepartment of Botany, Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.
Neeraj BudhlakotiICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Ram Narayan AhirwarDepartment of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.
Dwijesh Chandra MishraICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Sundeep KumarICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi, India.
Ramesh ChandDepartment of Mycology and Plant Pathology, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.
Uttam KumarBorlaug Institute for South Asia (BISA), Ladhowal, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6618-3810
Suneel KumarICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi, India.
Arun Kumar JoshiInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lesion mimic (Lm) mutants display hypersensitive responses (HR) without any pathogen attack; their symptoms are similar to those produced by a pathogen and result in cell death. In wheat, such mutants have been reported to be resistant against leaf rust due to their biotrophic nature. However, Lm mutants tend to encourage spot blotch (SB) disease caused by Bipolarissorokiniana since dead cells facilitate pathogen multiplication. In this study, 289 diverse wheat germplasm lines were phenotyped in three consecutive growing seasons (2012-2015). Genotype data was generated using the Illumina iSelect beadchip assay platform for wheat germplasm lines. A total of 13,589 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were selected andused for further association mapping. Lm was positively associated with Area Under Disease Progress Curve (AUDPC) for SB but negatively with glaucous index (GI), leaf tip necrosis (Ltn) and latent period (LP). Ltn had a negative association with AUDPC and Lm but a positive one with LP. In a genome-wide association study (GWAS), 29 markers were significantly associated with these traits and 27 were an notated. Seven SNP markers associated with Lm were on chromosome 6A; another on 1B was found to be linked with Ltn. Like wise, seven SNP markers were associated with GI; one on chromosome 6A with the others on 6B. Five SNP markers on chromosomes 3B and 3Dwere significantly correlated with LP, while nine SNP markers on chromosomes 5A and 5B were significantly associated with AUDPC for SB. This study is the first to explore the interaction in wheat between Lm mutants and the hemibiotrophic SB pathogen B.sorokiniana.

Indexed as

Area Under CurveBasidiomycotaChromosome MappingDisease ResistanceGenome-Wide Association StudyGenotypeLinkage DisequilibriumPhenotypePlant DiseasesPolymorphism, Single NucleotideQuantitative Trait LociROC CurveSeasonsTriticum

Identifiers

PMID33017405
PMCPMC7535040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.