Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33017129›Full record

ArticlePharmacogenetics and genomics2020

Patient insights on features of an effective pharmacogenomics patient portal.

Tien M Truong, Elizabeth Lipschultz, Emily Schierer, Keith Danahey, Mark J Ratain, Peter H O'Donnell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacogenetics and genomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Moving Pharmacogenetics Into Practice: It's All About the Evidence!Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tien M TruongCommittee on Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics.
Elizabeth LipschultzCenter for Personalized Therapeutics.
Emily SchiererCenter for Personalized Therapeutics.
Keith DanaheyCenter for Personalized Therapeutics.
Mark J RatainCommittee on Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics.
Peter H O'DonnellCommittee on Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics.

Funding

Developing an Oncology Workforce for the 21st Century - Renewal 01K12CA139160 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI OLOPADE, OLUFUNMILAYO F., SMITH, SONALI · 2010 to 2024
$10.6M
CLINICAL THERAPEUTICST32GM007019 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Peter Hugh O'Donnell, MARK J RATAIN · 1985 to 2026
$8.7M
Implementation of Point-of-Care Pharmacogenomic Decision Support in Perioperative Care - Resubmission 01R01HG009938 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI O'DONNELL, PETER HUGH · 2018 to 2022
$4.0M
NCI NIH HHS K12 CA139160NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG009938NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe built a novel mock pharmacogenomics web portal to deliver pharmacogenomic information and results to patients. Utilizing a patient focus group, we then sought to understand patient insights on desired features of an effective pharmacogenomics patient portal.

methodsThe mock YourPGx Portal delivered four sample pharmacogenomic results (omeprazole, simvastatin, clopidogrel, and codeine). Patients from our existing institutional, prospective pharmacogenomics implementation study were recruited to pilot the mock portal and then asked to participate in a focus group discussion led by two facilitators. All patients had been previously genotyped, but none had been directly provided access to their own genotyping results and none had previously used the YourPGx portal. The focus group discussion explored nine domains: (1) factors influencing drug response, (2) concerns about drug effects, (3) understanding of genomics and pharmacogenomics, (4) reasons to undergo pharmacogenomic testing, (5) sources of pharmacogenomic information for patient education, (6) attributes of pharmacogenomic sources of information, (7) considerations about privacy and personal pharmacogenomic information, (8) sharing of pharmacogenomic information, and (9) features of an effective patient portal.

resultsThe median age of patients (n = 10) was 65.5 years old (range 38-72), 70% female, 50% Caucasian/30% Black, and 60% held a bachelor/advanced degree. When asked about resources for seeking pharmacogenomic information, patients preferred consulting their providers first, followed by self-education, then using information provided by university research organizations. A theme emerged regarding attributes of these sources, namely a desire for understandability and trust. Patients said that the effectiveness of a pharmacogenomics patient portal is improved with use of symbolisms/graphics and clear and concise content. Effective use of colors, quantifying information, consistency, and use of layperson's language were additional important facets. Patients communicated the appeal of secured phone/app-enabled access and said that they would desire linking to their electronic medical records to allow sharing of information with different members of their healthcare team.

conclusionsPatients named providers as their primary source of pharmacogenomic information, but a pharmacogenomics patient portal that is carefully constructed to incorporate desired features may be a favorable tool to effectively deliver pharmacogenomic information and results to patients.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePrecision MedicineAdultAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient PortalsPharmacogeneticsPharmacogenomic TestingProspective StudiesSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID33017129
PMCPMC7539134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.