Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33016928›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of clinical investigation2020

Multiomic analysis and immunoprofiling reveal distinct subtypes of human angiosarcoma.

Jason Yongsheng Chan, Jing Quan Lim, Joe Yeong, Vinod Ravi, Peiyong Guan, Arnoud Boot, Timothy Kwang Yong Tay, Sathiyamoorthy Selvarajan, Nur Diyana Md Nasir, Jie Hua Loh and 17 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of clinical investigation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Angiosarcoma: Role of Immunotherapy.Current treatment options in oncology · 2025
    Review
  20. Review

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 10 institutions in 5 countries.

Jason Yongsheng ChanDivision of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.
Jing Quan LimLymphoma Genomic Translational Research Laboratory, Division of Cellular and Molecular Research, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.
Joe YeongDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Vinod RaviDepartment of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Peiyong GuanIntegrated Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Programme.
Arnoud BootIntegrated Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Programme.
Timothy Kwang Yong TayDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Sathiyamoorthy SelvarajanDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Nur Diyana Md NasirDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Jie Hua LohDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Choon Kiat OngLymphoma Genomic Translational Research Laboratory, Division of Cellular and Molecular Research, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.
Dachuan HuangLymphoma Genomic Translational Research Laboratory, Division of Cellular and Molecular Research, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.
Jing TanLaboratory of Cancer Epigenome, Division of Medical Sciences National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.
Zhimei LiLaboratory of Cancer Epigenome, Division of Medical Sciences National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.
Cedric Chuan-Young NgLaboratory of Cancer Epigenome, Division of Medical Sciences National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.
Thuan Tong TanDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Mikio MasuzawaDepartment of Regulation Biochemistry, School of Allied Health Sciences, Kitasato University, Minato City, Tokyo, Japan.
Ken Wing-Kin SungGenome Institute of Singapore, A*STAR, Singapore.
Mohamad FaridDivision of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.
Richard Hong Hui QuekDivision of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.
Ngian Chye TanDivision of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.
Melissa Ching Ching TeoDivision of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.
Steven George RozenIntegrated Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Programme.
Patrick TanCancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Andrew FutrealDepartment of Genomic Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Bin Tean TehCancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Khee Chee SooDivision of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.
National Cancer Centre Singapore · SGSingapore General Hospital · SGSingHealth Duke-NUS Academic Medical Centre · SGAgency for Science, Technology and Research · SGDuke-NUS Medical School · SGNational University of Singapore · SGThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USCentre for Cancer Biology · AUInstitute of Bioinformatics · INKitasato University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Angiosarcomas are rare, clinically aggressive tumors with limited treatment options and a dismal prognosis. We analyzed angiosarcomas from 68 patients, integrating information from multiomic sequencing, NanoString immuno-oncology profiling, and multiplex immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence for tumor-infiltrating immune cells. Through whole-genome sequencing (n = 18), 50% of the cutaneous head and neck angiosarcomas exhibited higher tumor mutation burden (TMB) and UV mutational signatures; others were mutationally quiet and non-UV driven. NanoString profiling revealed 3 distinct patient clusters represented by lack (clusters 1 and 2) or enrichment (cluster 3) of immune-related signaling and immune cells. Neutrophils (CD15+), macrophages (CD68+), cytotoxic T cells (CD8+), Tregs (FOXP3+), and PD-L1+ cells were enriched in cluster 3 relative to clusters 2 and 1. Likewise, tumor inflammation signature (TIS) scores were highest in cluster 3 (7.54 vs. 6.71 vs. 5.75, respectively; P < 0.0001). Head and neck angiosarcomas were predominant in clusters 1 and 3, providing the rationale for checkpoint immunotherapy, especially in the latter subgroup with both high TMB and TIS scores. Cluster 2 was enriched for secondary angiosarcomas and exhibited higher expression of DNMT1, BRD3/4, MYC, HRAS, and PDGFRB, in keeping with the upregulation of epigenetic and oncogenic signaling pathways amenable to targeted therapies. Molecular and immunological dissection of angiosarcomas may provide insights into opportunities for precision medicine.

Indexed as

HemangiosarcomaNeoplasm ProteinsCell Line, TumorFemaleHumansInflammationMaleNeoplasm ProteinsBioinformaticsCancerCancer immunotherapyGeneticsOncology

Identifiers

PMID33016928
PMCPMC7598061
OpenAlexW3091042659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.