Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33016872›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of urology2021

Perineoscopic vesicourethral reconstruction: A novel surgical technique for anastomotic stricture following radical prostatectomy.

Abdulmuttalip Şimşek, Yavuz Onur Danacıoğlu, Yusuf Arıkan, Osman Özdemir, Mustafa Gürkan Yenice, Feyzi Arda Atar, Ali İhsan Taşçı

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Abdulmuttalip ŞimşekDepartment of Urology, Bakırköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8003-4654
Yavuz Onur DanacıoğluDepartment of Urology, Bakırköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3170-062X
Yusuf ArıkanDepartment of Urology, Bakırköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0823-7400
Osman ÖzdemirDepartment of Urology, Bakırköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0375-8282
Mustafa Gürkan YeniceDepartment of Urology, Bakırköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5813-3565
Feyzi Arda AtarDepartment of Urology, Bakırköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7831-1501
Ali İhsan TaşçıDepartment of Urology, Bakırköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6943-6676
Bakırköy Dr.Sadi Konuk Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveVesicourethral anastomotic stenosis (VUAS) is frequently seen after prostate surgery because of various operative and postoperative factors. In this study, we aimed to present our results of perineoscopic bladder neck reconstruction, which is a new technique of the perineal approach in the treatment of patients with VUAS after prostate cancer surgery. MATERIAL AND

methodsSixteen consecutive patients who underwent perineoscopic bladder neck reconstruction in our clinic between July 2017 and March 2019 were included in the study. Demographic characteristics, surgical history, postoperative continence status, and additional treatment requirements were recorded. Perineoscopic surgery is defined as the visualization of the surgical site with instruments used in laparoscopy and the surgeon performing the entire operative procedure through the screen.

resultsThe mean number of preoperative endoscopic bladder neck resections of the patients was 7±5.1, with a history of suprapubic cystostomy in 7 (43.7%) and radiotherapy in 5 (31.2%) patients before surgery. The mean surgical time was 126.2±13.1 min. The mean follow-up period was 13.2±6.8 months, and the success rate was 81.25%. During follow-up, two (12.5%) patients received perineoscopic re-do reconstruction because of stricture recurrence, and one (6.2%) patient was included in a urethral dilatation program.

conclusionImproving visualization and ergonomics with the perineoscopic approach can increase the success rate of bladder neck reconstruction in comparison with the standard approach. In addition, the lack of need for expanded dissection (corporal separation, inferior pubectomy) reduces postoperative complication rates.

Identifiers

PMID33016872
PMCPMC7815237
OpenAlexW3089832276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.