Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33016869›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of urology2021

Effect of lesion diameter and prostate volume on prostate cancer detection rate of magnetic resonance imaging: Transrectal-ultrasonography-guided fusion biopsies using cognitive targeting.

Eriz Özden, Çağrı Akpınar, Arif İbiş, Eralp Kubilay, Ayşe Erden, Önder Yaman

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eriz ÖzdenDepartment of Urology Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6843-9368
Çağrı AkpınarDepartment of Urology Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0288-8272
Arif İbişDepartment of Urology Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8581-2101
Eralp KubilayDepartment of Urology Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1055-0500
Ayşe ErdenDepartment of Radiology, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9518-5428
Önder YamanDepartment of Urology Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1587-0688
Ankara University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the effect of prostate volume and lesion size on the clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection rates of transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsies, performed by a cognitive targeting method for sampling peripheral zone lesions. MATERIAL AND

methodsWe retrospectively enrolled 219 consecutive patients, who underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging with a 3-T scanner and had peripheral zone lesions suspected for prostate cancer. All of these patients underwent combined cognitive targeted biopsy of suspicious lesions and TRUS-guided systematic biopsy. The detection rates of csPCa according to different lesion diameters (<5 mm, 5-9.9 mm, and ≥10 mm) and prostate volumes (<30 mL, 30-49.9 mL, 50-79.9 mL, and ≥80 mL) were calculated per lesion basis. In addition, subgroup analysis of csPCa detection rates was performed according to Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System scores of lesions.

resultsThe csPCa detection rates according to lesion diameters <5 mm, 5-9.9 mm, and ≥10 mm were 4%, 9.8%, and 33.1%, respectively, and were significantly lower for lesions <10 mm (p<0.001). The csPCa detection rates were 61.5%, 24.1%, 16.2%, and 6.9%, respectively, for prostate volumes <30 mL, 30-49.9 mL, 50-79.9 mL, and ≥80 mL, and were significantly higher for prostate volumes <30 mL (p<0.001).

conclusionsClinicians should be very careful when they prefer cognitive targeted prostatic biopsy in patients with periferal zone lesions less than 10 mm and with prostate volumes greater than 30 mL, because of significantly low csPCa detection rates.

Identifiers

PMID33016869
PMCPMC7815233
OpenAlexW3091245940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.