Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33016608›Full record

ArticleThe plant genome2020

Non-homology-based prediction of gene functions in maize (Zea mays ssp. mays).

Xiuru Dai, Zheng Xu, Zhikai Liang, Xiaoyu Tu, Silin Zhong, James C Schnable, Pinghua Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The plant genome, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Genome-wide annotation and expression analysis ofFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  6. Dynamic interplay ofFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Predicting transcriptional responses to cold stress across plant species.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Xiuru DaiState Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian, 273100, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2516-1068
Zheng XuDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Wright State University, Dayton, OH, 45435, USA.
Zhikai LiangQuantitative Life Sciences Initiative, Center for Plant Science Innovation, and Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, 68588, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9963-8631
Xiaoyu TuState Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology, School of Life Sciences, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Silin ZhongState Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology, School of Life Sciences, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
James C SchnableQuantitative Life Sciences Initiative, Center for Plant Science Innovation, and Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, 68588, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6739-5527
Pinghua LiState Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian, 273100, China.
University of Nebraska–Lincoln · USChinese University of Hong Kong · HKShandong Agricultural University · CNWright State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in genome sequencing and annotation have eased the difficulty of identifying new gene sequences. Predicting the functions of these newly identified genes remains challenging. Genes descended from a common ancestral sequence are likely to have common functions. As a result, homology is widely used for gene function prediction. This means functional annotation errors also propagate from one species to another. Several approaches based on machine learning classification algorithms were evaluated for their ability to accurately predict gene function from non-homology gene features. Among the eight supervised classification algorithms evaluated, random-forest-based prediction consistently provided the most accurate gene function prediction. Non-homology-based functional annotation provides complementary strengths to homology-based annotation, with higher average performance in Biological Process GO terms, the domain where homology-based functional annotation performs the worst, and weaker performance in Molecular Function GO terms, the domain where the accuracy of homology-based functional annotation is highest. GO prediction models trained with homology-based annotations were able to successfully predict annotations from a manually curated "gold standard" GO annotation set. Non-homology-based functional annotation based on machine learning may ultimately prove useful both as a method to assign predicted functions to orphan genes which lack functionally characterized homologs, and to identify and correct functional annotation errors which were propagated through homology-based functional annotations.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyZea maysAlgorithmsChromosome MappingMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID33016608
PMCPMC12806910
OpenAlexW3023691275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.