Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33016564›Full record

ArticleApplied psychology. Health and well-being2020

Mental Health Conditions of Italian Healthcare Professionals during the COVID-19 Disease Outbreak.

Maria Laura Bettinsoli, Daniela Di Riso, Jaime L Napier, Lorenzo Moretti, Pierfrancesco Bettinsoli, Michelangelo Delmedico, Andrea Piazzolla, Biagio Moretti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied psychology. Health and well-being, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Psychiatric Issues Among Health Professionals.The Medical clinics of North America · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Experiencing and witnessing disruptive behaviors toward nurses in COVID-19 teams, patient safety, and errors in care.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maria Laura BettinsoliNew York University Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0002-5860-2675
Daniela Di RisoUniversità degli Studi di Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3759-0441
Jaime L NapierNew York University Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0002-5507-3798
Lorenzo MorettiAzienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Consorziale Policlinico di Bari, Italy.
Pierfrancesco BettinsoliIstituto Clinico Sant'Anna Brescia, Italy.
Michelangelo DelmedicoAzienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Consorziale Policlinico di Bari, Italy.
Andrea PiazzollaAzienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Consorziale Policlinico di Bari, Italy.
Biagio MorettiAzienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Consorziale Policlinico di Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1234-8616

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic in Italy represents a unique threat in terms of psychological distress. This cross-sectional study aims to investigate the psychological health of Italian healthcare professionals during the COVID-19 outbreak. We assessed participants' current psychological distress and coping strategies in the midst of the COVID outbreak (March-April 2020), and also asked them to retrospectively report how they remember feeling before the COVID-19 outbreak (December 2019). We examined associations between psychological distress and coping strategies with mental health and infection perceptions.

methodsSelf-administered questionnaires were distributed online to healthcare professionals (N = 580) residing in different Italian regions from 26 March to 9 April 2020. The questionnaire measured changes in psychological states, coping strategies, and demographic variables testing variations in mental health and infection risk perception among Italian healthcare workers.

resultsOverall, approximately 33.5 per cent of healthcare professionals in our sample meet the threshold for psychiatric morbidity. Participants perceive their current psychological health to be worse during the COVID-19 emergency outbreak as compared to before the outbreak, and this was especially true among women.

conclusionsBoth immediate and long-term monitoring psychological assistance services for healthcare workers should be implemented by national institutions to re-establish the psychological well-being and enhance the self-confidence and resilience of hospital personnel.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalCOVID-19AdultBehavioral SymptomsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansItalyMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedPersonnel, HospitalPsychological DistressRisk AssessmentSex FactorsStress, PsychologicalCOVID-19healthcare workersItalymental healthrisk perception

Identifiers

PMID33016564
PMCPMC7675316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.