Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33016008›Full record

ArticleBJS open2020

Recruitment and retention of participants in UK surgical trials: survey of key issues reported by trial staff.

J C Crocker, N Farrar, J A Cook, S Treweek, K Woolfall, A Chant, J Bostock, L Locock, S Rees, S Olszowski and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJS open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05865964 (Evaluation of Anthropological, Socio-cultural and Psychological Factors of Surgeons Practising in Oncology Which Condition Brakes in the Evaluation of Surgical Innovations), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05865964 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of Anthropological, Socio-cultural and Psychological Factors of Surgeons Practising in Oncology Which Condition Brakes in the Evaluation of Surgical Innovations

TypeobservationalSponsorInstitut Claudius RegaudRan2022 to 2025Enrolled200ConditionsSurgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in Otolaryngology research: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

J C CrockerNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8223-0349
N FarrarMRC ConDuCT-II Hub for Trials Methodology Research, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK.
J A CookSurgical Intervention Trials Unit, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4156-6989
S TreweekHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
K WoolfallDepartment of Public Health, Policy and Systems, Institute of Population Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
A ChantPatient partner, Cookham, Berkshire, UK.
J BostockQuality Safety and Outcomes Policy Research Unit, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.
L LocockHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
S ReesOxford Academic Health Science Network, Oxford, UK.
S OlszowskiNational Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK.
R BulbuliaClinical Trial Service Unit Hub for Trials Methodology Research, Oxford, UK.

Funding

Chief Scientist Office HSRU1Chief Scientist Office HSRU2Medical Research Council MR/K025643/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecruitment and retention of participants in surgical trials is challenging. Knowledge of the most common and problematic issues will aid future trial design. This study aimed to identify trial staff perspectives on the main issues affecting participant recruitment and retention in UK surgical trials.

methodsAn online survey of UK surgical trial staff was performed. Respondents were asked whether or not they had experienced a range of recruitment and retention issues, and, if yes, how relatively problematic these were (no, mild, moderate or serious problem).

resultsThe survey was completed by 155 respondents including 60 trial managers, 53 research nurses, 20 trial methodologists and 19 chief investigators. The three most common recruitment issues were: patients preferring one treatment over another (81·5 per cent of respondents); clinicians' time constraints (78·1 per cent); and clinicians preferring one treatment over another (76·8 per cent). Seven recruitment issues were rated moderate or serious problems by a majority of respondents, the most problematic being a lack of eligible patients (60·3 per cent). The three most common retention issues were: participants forgetting to return questionnaires (81·4 per cent); participants found to be ineligible for the trial (74·3 per cent); and long follow-up period (70·7 per cent). The most problematic retention issues, rated moderate or serious by the majority of respondents, were participants forgetting to return questionnaires (56·4 per cent) and insufficient research nurse time/funding (53·6 per cent).

conclusionThe survey identified a variety of common recruitment and retention issues, several of which were rated moderate or serious problems by the majority of participating UK surgical trial staff. Mitigation of these problems may help boost recruitment and retention in surgical trials.

Identifiers

PMID33016008
PMCPMC7709375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.