Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33015601›Full record

ArticleWater research X2020

Use of stable nitrogen isotopes to track plant uptake of nitrogen in a nature-based treatment system.

Aidan R Cecchetti, Anneliese Sytsma, Angela N Stiegler, Todd E Dawson, David L Sedlak

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Water research X, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Aidan R CecchettiDepartment of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of California Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94720, United States.
Anneliese SytsmaDepartment of Landscape Architecture and Environmental Planning, University of California Berkeley Berkeley, CA, 94720, United States.
Angela N StieglerDepartment of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of California Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94720, United States.
Todd E DawsonDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of California Berkeley Berkeley, CA, 94720, United States.
David L SedlakDepartment of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of California Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94720, United States.
University of California, Berkeley · USU.S. National Science Foundation · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In nature-based treatment systems, such as constructed wetlands, plant uptake of nutrients can be a significant removal pathway. Current methods for quantifying plant uptake of nitrogen in constructed wetlands, which often involve harvesting biomass and assuming that all nitrogen stored in plants was derived from wastewater, are inappropriate in pilot- and full-scale systems where other sources of nitrogen are available. To improve our understanding of nitrogen cycling in constructed wetlands, we developed a new method to quantify plant uptake of nitrogen by using stable isotopes and a mixing model to distinguish between nitrogen sources. We applied this new method to a pilot-scale horizontal levee system (i.e., a subsurface constructed wetland) over a two-year monitoring period, during which 14% of nitrogen in plants was wastewater-derived on average and the remaining plant nitrogen was obtained from the soil. Analysis of nitrogen isotopes indicated substantial spatial variability in the wetland: 82% of nitrogen in plants within the first 2 m of the slope came from wastewater while less than 12% of plant nitrogen in the remainder of the wetland originated from wastewater. By combining these source contributions with remote-sensing derived total biomass measurements, we calculated that 150 kg N (95% CI = 50 kg N, 330 kg N) was taken up and retained by plants during the two-year monitoring period, which corresponded to approximately 8% of nitrogen removed in the wetland. Nitrogen uptake followed seasonal trends, increased as plants matured, and varied based on design parameters (e.g., plant types), suggesting that design decisions can impact this removal pathway. This new method can help inform efforts to understand nitrogen cycling and optimize the design of nature-based nutrient control systems.

Indexed as

Mixing modelsNature-based treatmentNitrogen removalPlant uptakeRemote-sensingStable isotopes

Identifiers

PMID33015601
PMCPMC7522481
OpenAlexW3085420403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.