Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33015585›Full record

ArticleJOR spine2020

Influence of testing environment and loading rate on intervertebral disc compressive mechanics: An assessment of repeatability at three different laboratories.

Nicolas Newell, David Rivera Tapia, Tamanna Rahman, Shiyin Lim, Grace D O'Connell, Timothy P Holsgrove

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JOR spine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. SiACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Nicolas NewellDepartment of Mechanical Engineering Imperial College London London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1288-3990
David Rivera TapiaDepartment of Engineering University of Exeter Exeter UK.
Tamanna RahmanDepartment of Mechanical Engineering Imperial College London London UK.
Shiyin LimDepartment of Mechanical Engineering University of California Berkeley California USA.
Grace D O'ConnellDepartment of Mechanical Engineering University of California Berkeley California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0746-1638
Timothy P HolsgroveDepartment of Engineering University of Exeter Exeter UK.
Imperial College London · GBUniversity of Exeter · GBUniversity of California, Berkeley · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In vitro mechanical testing of intervertebral discs is crucial for basic science and pre-clinical testing. Generally, these tests aim to replicate in vivo conditions, but simplifications are necessary in specimen preparation and mechanical testing due to complexities in both structure and the loading conditions required to replicate in vivo conditions. There has been a growing interest in developing a consensus of testing protocols within the spine community to improve comparison of results between studies. The objective of this study was to perform axial compression experiments on bovine bone-disc-bone specimens at three institutions. No differences were observed between testing environment being air, with PBS soaked gauze, or a PBS bath (

Indexed as

intervertebral discloading ratestrain ratetest environmenttest repeatability

Identifiers

PMID33015585
PMCPMC7524251
OpenAlexW3042940944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.