ReviewTherapeutic advances in vaccines and immunotherapy2020
Delivery of adoptive cell therapy in the context of the health-care system in the UK: challenges for clinical sites.
Review in Therapeutic advances in vaccines and immunotherapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Circadian rhythm in immunotherapy and cellular therapy: impacts on the tumor microenvironment.Acta biochimica et biophysica Sinica · 2026Review
- Constraints on delivering cell and gene therapies identified during technology appraisal by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2025Article
- Exploring the readiness of the Irish healthcare system to adopt advanced therapies: a scoping review protocol.Regenerative medicine · 2024Article
- Nurses' reported training needs for advanced cell therapies: a survey on behalf of the Nurses Group of the EBMT.Clinical hematology international · 2024Article
- Program management challenges of clinical studies: A qualitative critical assessment.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMPs) comprise novel cell, tissue and gene therapies and offer the potential of durable remissions for diseases where there is a high unmet clinical need. Once considered a niche area of academic research, ATMPs now represent one of the fastest-growing areas of clinical development. The field has seen a rapid expansion of academic and commercial entities successfully translating ATMP research into the clinic. This is reflected in projection that the global gene and cell therapy market will be worth US $11.96 billion by 2025. However, these treatments are complex to deliver and frequently do not fit naturally into established healthcare systems. In the United Kingdom (UK) there has been a long-standing interest in ATMP research and, in order to meet the ambition to act as an international hub of activity for delivery of ATMPs, a collaborative network of Advanced Therapy Treatment Centres (ATTCs) has been established. This review explores the challenges of delivery in the clinical setting, focussing on one form of ATMP, Adoptive Cell Therapy (ACT). We describe the strategy being implemented in the UK to optimise the roll-out of these exciting new therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.