Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33015484›Full record

ArticleACS omega2020

Droplet-Based Cytotoxicity Assay: Implementation of Time-Efficient Screening of Antitumor Activity of Natural Killer Cells.

Silvia Antona, Ilia Platzman, Joachim P Spatz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Single Cell-Pair Proteomics for Decoding Immune-Cancer Cell Interactions.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Silvia AntonaDepartment of Cellular Biophysics, Max Planck Institute for Medical Research, Jahnstraße 29, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Ilia PlatzmanDepartment of Cellular Biophysics, Max Planck Institute for Medical Research, Jahnstraße 29, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Joachim P SpatzDepartment of Cellular Biophysics, Max Planck Institute for Medical Research, Jahnstraße 29, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural killer (NK) cells are key players of the innate immune system. Due to their rapid cytotoxicity against infectious pathogens, hematologic malignancies, and solid tumors, NK cells represent solid candidates for cell-based immunotherapy. Despite the progress made in recent years, the heterogeneity in their cytotoxic behavior represents a drawback. With the goal of screening the intrinsic diversity of NK cells, droplet-based microfluidic technology is exploited to develop a single-cell time-efficient cytotoxicity assay. Toward this end, NK-92 cells are coencapsulated with hematological tumor cell lines in water-in-oil droplets of different sizes and their cytotoxic activity is evaluated. The effect of droplet-based confinement on NK cytotoxicity is investigated by controlling the droplet volume. The successful optimization of the droplet size allows for time efficiency compared to cytotoxicity assays based on flow cytometry. Additionally, the ability of individual NK-92 cells to kill multiple target cells in series is explored, expanding the knowledge about the serial killing process dynamics. The developed droplet-based microfluidic assay does not require the labeling of NK cells and represents a step toward developing of a forthcoming process for the selection of NK cells with the highest cytotoxicity against specific targets.

Identifiers

PMID33015484
PMCPMC7528335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.