ArticleEndoscopy international open2020
Physician sentiment toward artificial intelligence (AI) in colonoscopic practice: a survey of US gastroenterologists.
Article in Endoscopy international open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.
- Healthcare professionals' perspectives on artificial intelligence in patient care: a systematic review of hindering and facilitating factors on different levels.BMC health services research · 2025Pooled it
- User perceptions of an artificial intelligence-based computer-aided detection system in colonoscopy: a single-center exploratory survey study.Journal of minimally invasive surgery · 2026Article
- Endoscopists' attitudes toward and experiences with artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy: a 3-year follow-up survey after the implementation of GI Genius.Annals of coloproctology · 2026Article
- Patients' experiences and attitudes toward the use of real-time artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2026Article
- Training future endoscopists: gastroenterology fellows' perspectives and hands-on exposure to artificial intelligence for polyp detection in the United States.iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights · 2026Article
- Endoscopist and Patients' Values and Preferences on Artificial Intelligence in Endoscopy: An Intercontinental Opinion Survey by the World Endoscopy Organization.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2026Article
- Advanced computer-aided detection system exhibits no more false positives than experienced endoscopists in an image-based comparative study of colon polyps.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- A Model Predicting Artificial Intelligence Use by Gastroenterology Nurses in Clinical Practice: A Cross-Sectional Multicenter Survey.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025Article
- Survey on the perceptions of Asian endoscopists to artificial intelligence.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence for diagnostics in radiology practice: a rapid systematic scoping review.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence Among Gastroenterologists in Italy: A National Survey.Cancers · 2025Article
- Barriers to and facilitators of clinician acceptance and use of artificial intelligence in healthcare settings: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2025Article
- A comparative study benchmarking colon polyp with computer-aided detection (CADe) software.DEN open · 2025Article
- Provider Attitudes and Perceptions on Using Artificial Intelligence in Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Gastro hep advances · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence Adoption in Surgery: Cognition, Usage Patterns and Implementation Barriers of DeepSeek Among Healthcare Professionals in China's Tertiary Hospitals.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence awareness and perceptions among pediatric orthopedic surgeons: A cross-sectional observational study.World journal of orthopedics · 2024Article
- Colorectal cancer screening: A review of current knowledge and progress in research.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Review
- Human-artificial intelligence interaction in gastrointestinal endoscopy.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2024Review
- Knowledge, perceptions and behaviours of endoscopists towards the use of artificial intelligence-aided colonoscopy.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Article
- The imitation game: a review of the use of artificial intelligence in colonoscopy, and endoscopists' perceptions thereof.Annals of coloproctology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.