ArticleEndoscopy international open2020
Educational interventions are associated with improvements in colonoscopy quality indicators: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Endoscopy international open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Video-based interventions to improve self-assessment accuracy among physicians: A systematic review.PloS one · 2023Pooled it
- Colonoscopy Quality and Strategies for Improvement.Gut and liver · 2026Review
- Personalizing withdrawal time by insertion time to achieve target adenoma detection rate in colonoscopy.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Use of Mechanical Enhanced Colonoscopy to Improve Polyp Detection During Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Real-World Healthcare Database Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Enhancing Patient Education for Colonoscopy Preparation: Strategies, Tools, and Best Practices.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Colonoscopy quality measures and adherence to follow-up guidelines among endoscopists participating in a U.S. endoscopy registry.Gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025Article
- Effectiveness and safety of thin vs. thick cold snare polypectomy of small colorectal polyps: Systematic review and meta-analysis.Endoscopy international open · 2024Review
- Causes and Outcomes of Medicolegal Proceedings Following Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Canada.Gastro hep advances · 2023Article
- Article
- Endocuff Vision improves adenoma detection rate in a large screening-related cohort.Endoscopy international open · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.