ArticleEndoscopy international open2020
ESD with double-balloon endoluminal intervention platform versus standard ESD for management of colon polyps.
Article in Endoscopy international open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04919824 (Comparison of the Performance of Monopolar Current Cutting Knife and Bipolar RFA Knife in Colonic Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparison of the Performance of Monopolar Current Cutting Knife and Bipolar RFA Knife in Colonic Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endoscopic approach to large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps.Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Learning curve for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in the United States: Large, untutored, single-operator experience.Endoscopy international open · 2024Article
- Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Superficial Colorectal Neoplasms at "Challenging Sites" Using a Double-Balloon Endoluminal Interventional Platform: A Single-Center Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Retrospective comparison of G-EYE balloon-colonoscopy with standard colonoscopy for increased adenoma detection rate and reduced polyp removal time.Endoscopy international open · 2023Article
- Role of Advanced Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in the Comprehensive Management of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.Cancers · 2023Review
- Expanding endoscopic boundaries: Endoscopic resection of large appendiceal orifice polyps with endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2023Article
- Multicenter prospective evaluation of an overtube endoluminal interventional platform for colorectal polypectomy.Endoscopy international open · 2023Article
- Underwater endoscopic submucosal dissection and hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection as rescue therapy in difficult colorectal cases.Endoscopy international open · 2022Article
- Purely endoscopic appendectomy.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2022Article
- EUS-guided cholecystoduodenostomy and ERCP in a patient with surgically altered anatomy with a double-balloon endoluminal interventional platform.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2021Article
- Combination of a dynamic rigidizing overtube and a novel injectable needle-type knife to facilitate colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2021Article
- Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection using the pocket-creation method with single clip traction: a feasibility study.Endoscopy international open · 2021Article
- Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: An Update on Best Practice.Clinical and experimental gastroenterology · 2021Review
- The Next Endoscopic Frontier: Considering a Career in Resection Endoscopy.ACG case reports journal · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.