ArticleInternational journal of women's dermatology2020
Gender and race trends in academic rank of dermatologists at top U.S. institutions: A cross-sectional study.
Article in International journal of women's dermatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- National-, institutional-, and individual-level determinants of dermatologic research excellence: an analysis of Stanford-Elsevier Lists of the top 2% scholars worldwide (2017-2023).Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Trends in Gender Representation at US Dermatology Grand Rounds (2000-2025): A Cross-Sectional Study.Dermatology practical & conceptual · 2025Article
- Assessing Gender Diversity in American Society for Dermatologic Surgery Fellowship Leadership: A 2013 to 2022 Trend Analysis.Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.] · 2024Article
- Gender distribution and NIH funding rank in dermatology leadership: a cross-sectional analysis.Archives of dermatological research · 2023Article
- Contribution of gender on compensation of Veterans Affairs-affiliated dermatologists: A cross-sectional study.International journal of women's dermatology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite growth in the proportion of women and underrepresented minorities in the dermatology workforce, gender and racial differences persist.
objectiveThis study sought to analyze the differences in academic rank between genders and races while controlling for achievement indicators.
methodsData from 15 institutions, selected based on residency program rankings, were analyzed.
resultsWomen were well-represented as assistant professors (60.7% vs. 37.6% of men;
conclusionOur findings confirm that for equal levels of achievement, men and women are promoted similarly in dermatology, yet reasons for disparity in research output and funding for women and minority dermatologists need further study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.