Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33015276›Full record

ArticleBiotribology (Oxford)2020

S Radice, J Westrick, K Ebinger, M T Mathew, M A Wimmer

Open access · greenAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Biotribology (Oxford), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

S RadiceRush University Medical Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, 1611 W. Harrison St., Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
J WestrickLibrary of Rush University Medical Center, 600 S. Paulina St., Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
K EbingerKlinikum Garmisch-Partenkirche, Auenstraße 6, 82467 Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany.
M T MathewCollege of Medicine at Rockford, University of Illinois, Department of Biomedical Sciences, 1601 Parkview Avenue, Rockford, IL 61107, USA.
M A WimmerRush University Medical Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, 1611 W. Harrison St., Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Rush University Medical Center · USGarmisch-Partenkirchen Medical Center · DERockford University · US

Funding

Determination of excessive immune reactivity to real time implant debris generateR21EB024039 · NIBIB · RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI HALLAB, NADIM JAMES, WIMMER, MARKUS ANTON · 2017 to 2018
$432k
NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB024039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tribocorrosion of implants has been widely addressed in the orthopedic and dental research fields. This study is a systematic scoping review about research methods that combine tribocorrosion tests with cells/tissues cultures, aimed to identify related current problems and future challenges. We used 4 different databases to identify 1022 records responding to an articulated keywords search-strategy. After removing the duplicates and the articles that didn't meet the search-criteria, we assessed 20 full-text articles for eligibility. Of the 20 eligible articles, we charted 8 records on cell cultures combined with tribocorrosion tests on implant materials (titanium, CoCrMo, and/or stainless steel). The year of publication ranged from 1991 to 2019. The cell line used was mostly murine. Two records used fretting tests, while 6 used reciprocating sliding with pin-on-disc tribometers. An electrochemical three-electrode setup was used in 4 records. We identified overall two experimental approaches: cells cultured on the metal (5 records), and cells cultured near the metal (3 records). Research activities on tribocorrosion processes in the presence of cells have been undertaken worldwide by a few groups. After a limited initial interest on this topic in the 1990's, research activities have restarted in the last decade, renewing the topic with technologically more advanced setups and analytical tools. We identified the main problems to be the lack of test reproducibility and wear particle characterization. We believe that the main challenges lay in the interdisciplinary approach, the inter-laboratory validation of experiments, and the interpretation of results, particularly in relation to potential clinical significance.

Indexed as

Cell culturesDentistryImplantsOrthopedicsTribocorrosionWear debris

Identifiers

PMID33015276
PMCPMC7528855
OpenAlexW3083730821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.