Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33015017›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2020

Design and Evaluation of an Osteogenesis-on-a-Chip Microfluidic Device Incorporating 3D Cell Culture.

Hossein Bahmaee, Robert Owen, Liam Boyle, Cecile M Perrault, Andres A Garcia-Granada, Gwendolen C Reilly, Frederik Claeyssens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hossein BahmaeeDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Kroto Research Institute, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Robert OwenDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Kroto Research Institute, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Liam BoyleDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Kroto Research Institute, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Cecile M PerraultINSIGNEO Institute for in silico Medicine, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Andres A Garcia-GranadaGrup d'Enginyeria de Productes Industrials, IQS, Universitat Ramon Llull, Barcelona, Spain.
Gwendolen C ReillyDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Kroto Research Institute, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Frederik ClaeyssensDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Kroto Research Institute, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/L012669/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microfluidic-based tissue-on-a-chip devices have generated significant research interest for biomedical applications, such as pharmaceutical development, as they can be used for small volume, high throughput studies on the effects of therapeutics on tissue-mimics. Tissue-on-a-chip devices are evolving from basic 2D cell cultures incorporated into microfluidic devices to complex 3D approaches, with modern designs aimed at recapitulating the dynamic and mechanical environment of the native tissue. Thus far, most tissue-on-a-chip research has concentrated on organs involved with drug uptake, metabolism and removal (e.g., lung, skin, liver, and kidney); however, models of the drug metabolite target organs will be essential to provide information on therapeutic efficacy. Here, we develop an osteogenesis-on-a-chip device that comprises a 3D environment and fluid shear stresses, both important features of bone. This inexpensive, easy-to-fabricate system based on a polymerized High Internal Phase Emulsion (polyHIPE) supports proliferation, differentiation and extracellular matrix production of human embryonic stem cell-derived mesenchymal progenitor cells (hES-MPs) over extended time periods (up to 21 days). Cells respond positively to both chemical and mechanical stimulation of osteogenesis, with an intermittent flow profile containing rest periods strongly promoting differentiation and matrix formation in comparison to static and continuous flow. Flow and shear stresses were modeled using computational fluid dynamics. Primary cilia were detectable on cells within the device channels demonstrating that this mechanosensory organelle is present in the complex 3D culture environment. In summary, this device aids the development of 'next-generation' tools for investigating novel therapeutics for bone in comparison with standard laboratory and animal testing.

Indexed as

additive manufacturebioreactorcomputational fluid dynamicsmechanotransductionorgan-on-a-chippolyHIPEtissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID33015017
PMCPMC7509430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.