Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33014966›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2020

Bacterial Genome Wide Association Studies (bGWAS) and Transcriptomics Identifies Cryptic Antimicrobial Resistance Mechanisms in

Chandler Roe, Charles H D Williamson, Adam J Vazquez, Kristen Kyger, Michael Valentine, Jolene R Bowers, Paul D Phillips, Veronica Harrison, Elizabeth Driebe, David M Engelthaler and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Phenotype-Based Threat Assessment.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  9. Update on Multidrug Resistance Efflux Pumps in Acinetobacter spp.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Chandler RoeNorthern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, United States.
Charles H D WilliamsonNorthern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, United States.
Adam J VazquezNorthern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, United States.
Kristen KygerNorthern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, United States.
Michael ValentineTranslational Genomics Research Institute, Flagstaff, AZ, United States.
Jolene R BowersTranslational Genomics Research Institute, Flagstaff, AZ, United States.
Paul D PhillipsNorthern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, United States.
Veronica HarrisonTranslational Genomics Research Institute, Flagstaff, AZ, United States.
Elizabeth DriebeTranslational Genomics Research Institute, Flagstaff, AZ, United States.
David M EngelthalerTranslational Genomics Research Institute, Flagstaff, AZ, United States.
Jason W SahlNorthern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, United States.

Funding

Antimicrobial susceptibility associations in Acinetobacter baumannii based on genomic and transcriptomic analysesR21AI121738 · NIAID · NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY · PI SAHL, JASON · 2016 to 2017
$491k
NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI121738
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in the nosocomial pathogen,

Indexed as

Acinetobacter baumanniiAcinetobacter InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsArizonaDrug Resistance, BacterialGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansTranscriptomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsacinetobacterAMRbioinformaticsgenomicstranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID33014966
PMCPMC7493718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.