Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33014841›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2020

Quo Vadis Oncological Hyperthermia (2020)?

Sun-Young Lee, Giammaria Fiorentini, Attila Marcell Szasz, Gyula Szigeti, Andras Szasz, Carrie Anne Minnaar

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. On the Evaluation of the Hyperthermic Efficiency of Magnetic Scaffolds.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Complementary and Alternative Therapies in Oncology.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Sun-Young LeeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Chonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonbuk, South Korea.
Giammaria FiorentiniMedical Oncology Department, Ospedale San Salvatore, Pesaro, Italy.
Attila Marcell SzaszDivision of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine and Oncology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Gyula SzigetiInnovation Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Andras SzaszBiotechnics Department, St. Istvan University, Godollo, Hungary.
Carrie Anne MinnaarDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Wits Donald Gordon Medical Center, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Semmelweis University · HUJeonbuk National University Hospital · KRSan Salvatore Hospital · ITWits University Donald Gordon Medical Centre · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heating as a medical intervention in cancer treatment is an ancient approach, but effective deep heating techniques are lacking in modern practice. The use of electromagnetic interactions has enabled the development of more reliable local-regional hyperthermia (LRHT) techniques whole-body hyperthermia (WBH) techniques. Contrary to the relatively simple physical-physiological concepts behind hyperthermia, its development was not steady, and it has gone through periods of failures and renewals with mixed views on the benefits of heating seen in the medical community over the decades. In this review we study in detail the various techniques currently available and describe challenges and trends of oncological hyperthermia from a new perspective. Our aim is to describe what we believe to be a new and effective approach to oncologic hyperthermia, and a change in the paradigm of dosing. Physiological limits restrict the application of WBH which has moved toward the mild temperature range, targeting immune support. LRHT does not have a temperature limit in the tumor (which can be burned out in extreme conditions) but a trend has started toward milder temperatures with immune-oriented goals, developing toward immune modulation, and especially toward tumor-specific immune reactions by which LRHT seeks to target the malignancy systemically. The emerging research of bystander and abscopal effects, in both laboratory investigations and clinical applications, has been intensified. Our present review summarizes the methods and results, and discusses the trends of hyperthermia in oncology.

Indexed as

abscopal effectbystander-effecthyperthermiaimmune effectsoncologytrend

Identifiers

PMID33014841
PMCPMC7499808
OpenAlexW3083649104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.