ArticleGlobal food security2020
Regulatory barriers to improving global food security.
Article in Global food security, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metabolic engineering of cereal lipids: from omega-3 fatty acids to wax esters and pheromones.Advanced biotechnology · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Detection of Abiotic Stress in Plants: A Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Smarter stomata: emergent technologies unlocking yield potential in a changing climate.AoB PLANTS · 2025Review
- Smartphones as Catalysts for Synergistic Nutrition: A New Era in Bioactive Detection, Personalization, and Food System Intelligence.Food science & nutrition · 2025Review
- Regulation as key to fulfilling the promises of agricultural genomics: Going beyond bottlenecks in plant gene technology development.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025Review
- Can the molecular and transgenic breeding of crops be an alternative and sustainable technology to meet food demand?Functional & integrative genomics · 2025Review
- Genome editing in grain legumes for food security.Frontiers in genome editing · 2025Review
- Photosynthesis: Genetic Strategies Adopted to Gain Higher Efficiency.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Microbial Catalysis for COCold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2024Review
- Processes for regulating genetically modified and gene edited plants.GM crops & food · 2023Review
- Genetically engineered crops for sustainably enhanced food production systems.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Review
- CRISPR/Cas- and Topical RNAi-Based Technologies for Crop Management and Improvement: Reviewing the Risk Assessment and Challenges Towards a More Sustainable Agriculture.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- Lessons for a SECURE Future: Evaluating Diversity in Crop Biotechnology Across Regulatory Regimes.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- An Outlook on Global Regulatory Landscape for Genome-Edited Crops.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Removing politics from innovations that improve food security.Transgenic research · 2021Review
- Global Regulation of Genetically Modified Crops Amid the Gene Edited Crop Boom - A Review.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Crop agriculture and food production constantly face climactic challenges to the supply of safe, nutritious food. These challenges highlight the importance of innovation resulting in improved crop technologies, capable of providing consistently increasing yields in the face of abiotic and biotic stresses. This article addresses the challenge that regulatory barriers are, and can, have on the adoption of innovative crop and food technologies that improve food security. Evidence of increased crop yield and the potential for increased yields, are presented from innovative plant breeding technologies, especially gene editing. Recent advances from the use of gene editing in the pharmaceutical field may offer opportunities to reduce regulatory burdens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.