Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33014608›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2020

Prospective detection of cervical dysplasia with scanning angle-resolved low coherence interferometry.

Wesley Y Kendall, Derek Ho, Kengyeh Chu, Michael Zinaman, Daryl Wieland, Kandis Moragne, Adam Wax

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wesley Y KendallDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
Derek HoDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
Kengyeh ChuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
Michael ZinamanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jacobi Medical Center, Bronx, NY 10461, USA.
Daryl WielandDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jacobi Medical Center, Bronx, NY 10461, USA.
Kandis MoragneDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jacobi Medical Center, Bronx, NY 10461, USA.
Adam WaxDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.

Funding

Novel Coherence Imaging to Evaluate the Health of the Cervical EpitheliumR01CA167421 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI WAX, ADAM · 2014 to 2018
$3.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA167421
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a prospective clinical study using angle-resolved low-coherence interferometry (a/LCI) to detect cervical dysplasia via depth resolved nuclear morphology measurements. The study, performed at the Jacobi Medical Center, compares 80 a/LCI optical biopsies taken from 20 women with histopathological tissue diagnosis of co-registered physical biopsies. A novel instrument was used for this study that enables 2D scanning across the cervix without repositioning the probe. The main study goal was to compare performance with a previous clinical a/LCI point-probe instrument [Int. J. Cancer140, 1447 (2017)] and use the same diagnostic criteria as in that study. Tissue was classified in two schemes: non-dysplastic vs. dysplastic and low-risk vs. high-risk, with the latter classification aligned with clinically actionable diagnosis. High sensitivity (non-dysplastic vs. dysplastic: 0.903, low-risk vs. high-risk: 1.000) and NPV (0.930 and 1.000 respectively) were obtained when using the previously established decision boundaries, showing the success of the scanning a/LCI instrument and reinforcing the clinical viability of a/LCI in disease detection.

Identifiers

PMID33014608
PMCPMC7510862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.