Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33014582›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2020

Fast TIRF-SIM imaging of dynamic, low-fluorescent biological samples.

Julian Roth, Johanna Mehl, Alexander Rohrbach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Julian RothLaboratory for Bio- and Nano-Photonics, Department of Microsystems Engineering, University of Freiburg, Germany.
Johanna MehlLaboratory for Bio- and Nano-Photonics, Department of Microsystems Engineering, University of Freiburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6140-1970
Alexander RohrbachLaboratory for Bio- and Nano-Photonics, Department of Microsystems Engineering, University of Freiburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluorescence microscopy is the standard imaging technique to investigate the structures and dynamics of living cells. However, increasing the spatial resolution comes at the cost of temporal resolution and vice versa. In addition, the number of images that can be taken in sufficiently high quality is limited by fluorescence bleaching. Hence, super-resolved imaging at several Hertz of low fluorescent biological samples is still a big challenge and, especially in structured illumination microscopy (SIM), is often visible as imaging artifacts. In this paper, we present a TIRF-SIM system based on scan-mirrors and a Michelson interferometer, which generates images at 110 nm spatial resolution and up to 8 Hz temporal resolution. High resolution becomes possible by optimizing the illumination interference contrast, even for low fluorescent, moving samples. We provide a framework and guidelines on how the modulation contrast, which depends on laser coherence, polarization, beam displacement or sample movements, can be mapped over the entire field of view. In addition, we characterize the influence of the signal-to-noise ratio and the Wiener filtering on the quality of reconstructed SIM images, both in real and frequency space. Our results are supported by theoretical descriptions containing the parameters leading to image artifacts. This study aims to help microscopists to better understand and adjust optical parameters for structured illumination, thereby leading to more trustworthy measurements and analyses of biological dynamics.

Identifiers

PMID33014582
PMCPMC7510889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.