ArticleBiomedical optics express2020
Deep OCT image compression with convolutional neural networks.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Survey on Optical Coherence Tomography-Technology and Application.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Multi-Scale Reconstruction of Undersampled Spectral-Spatial OCT Data for Coronary Imaging Using Deep Learning.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2022Article
- Deep neural-network based optimization for the design of a multi-element surface magnet for MRI applications.Inverse problems · 2022Article
- Anatomic and Molecular MR Image Synthesis Using Confidence Guided CNNs.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2021Article
- Lesion Mask-Based Simultaneous Synthesis of Anatomic and Molecular MR Images Using a GAN.Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We report an end-to-end image compression framework for retina optical coherence tomography (OCT) images based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs), which achieved an image size compression ratio as high as 80. Our compression scheme consists of three parts: data preprocessing, compression CNNs, and reconstruction CNNs. The preprocessing module was designed to reduce OCT speckle noise and segment out the region of interest. Skip connections with quantization were developed and added between the compression CNNs and the reconstruction CNNs to reserve the fine-structure information. Two networks were trained together by taking the semantic segmented images from the preprocessing module as input. To train the two networks sensitive to both low and high frequency information, we leveraged an objective function with two components: an adversarial discriminator to judge the high frequency information and a differentiable multi-scale structural similarity (MS-SSIM) penalty to evaluate the low frequency information. The proposed framework was trained and evaluated on ophthalmic OCT images with pathological information. The evaluation showed reconstructed images can still achieve above 99% similarity in terms of MS-SSIM when the compression ratio reached 40. Furthermore, the reconstructed images after 80-fold compression with the proposed framework even presented comparable quality with those of a compression ratio 20 from state-of-the-art methods. The test results showed that the proposed framework outperformed other methods in terms of both MS-SSIM and visualization, which was more obvious at higher compression ratios. Compression and reconstruction were fast and took only about 0.015 seconds per image. The results suggested a promising potential of deep neural networks on customized medical image compression, particularly valuable for effective image storage and tele-transfer.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.