Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33014414›Full record

ArticleBiomaterials research2020

In vivo bone regeneration assessment of offset and gradient melt electrowritten (MEW) PCL scaffolds.

Naghmeh Abbasi, Ryan S B Lee, Saso Ivanovski, Robert M Love, Stephen Hamlet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomaterials research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Advanced biomaterials for periodontal tissue regeneration.Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000) · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Naghmeh AbbasiSchool of Dentistry and Oral Health, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Southport, Queensland 4215 Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0005-6683
Ryan S B LeeSchool of Dentistry and Oral Health, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Southport, Queensland 4215 Australia.
Saso IvanovskiSchool of Dentistry, University of Queensland, Herston Campus, Herston, Queensland 4006 Australia.
Robert M LoveSchool of Dentistry and Oral Health, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Southport, Queensland 4215 Australia.
Stephen HamletSchool of Dentistry and Oral Health, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Southport, Queensland 4215 Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBiomaterial-based bone tissue engineering represents a promising solution to overcome reduced residual bone volume. It has been previously demonstrated that gradient and offset architectures of three-dimensional melt electrowritten poly-caprolactone (PCL) scaffolds could successfully direct osteoblast cells differentiation toward an osteogenic lineage, resulting in mineralization. The aim of this study was therefore to evaluate the in vivo osteoconductive capacity of PCL scaffolds with these different architectures.

methodsFive different calcium phosphate (CaP) coated melt electrowritten PCL pore sized scaffolds: 250 μm and 500 μm, 500 μm with 50% fibre offset (offset.50.50), tri layer gradient 250-500-750 μm (grad.250top) and 750-500-250 μm (grad.750top) were implanted into rodent critical-sized calvarial defects. Empty defects were used as a control. After 4 and 8 weeks of healing, the new bone was assessed by micro-computed tomography and immunohistochemistry.

resultsSignificantly more newly formed bone was shown in the grad.250top scaffold 8 weeks post-implantation. Histological investigation also showed that soft tissue was replaced with newly formed bone and fully covered the grad.250top scaffold. While, the bone healing did not happen completely in the 250 μm, offset.50.50 scaffolds and blank calvaria defects following 8 weeks of implantation. Immunohistochemical analysis showed the expression of osteogenic markers was present in all scaffold groups at both time points. The mineralization marker Osteocalcin was detected with the highest intensity in the grad.250top and 500 μm scaffolds. Moreover, the expression of the endothelial markers showed that robust angiogenesis was involved in the repair process.

conclusionsThese results suggest that the gradient pore size structure provides superior conditions for bone regeneration.

Indexed as

AngiogenesisBone tissue engineeringMelt electrowritingPoly (ε-caprolactone)Pore sizeScaffold

Identifiers

PMID33014414
PMCPMC7529514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.