Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33014390›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology practice2020

Death-related distress in adult primary brain tumor patients.

Ashlee R Loughan, Farah J Aslanzadeh, Julia Brechbiel, Gary Rodin, Mariya Husain, Sarah E Braun, Kelcie D Willis, Autumn Lanoye

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Neuro-oncology practice · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Facing life-threat during youth: a qualitative study on challenges, coping, and needs among adolescents and young adults with cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ashlee R LoughanVirginia Commonwealth University, Department of Neurology, Division of Neuro-Oncology, Richmond, Virginia.
Farah J AslanzadehVirginia Commonwealth University, Department of Psychology, Richmond, Virginia.
Julia BrechbielVirginia Commonwealth University, Department of Psychology, Richmond, Virginia.
Gary RodinPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Department of Supportive Care, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Mariya HusainVirginia Commonwealth University, School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia.
Sarah E BraunVirginia Commonwealth University, Department of Psychology, Richmond, Virginia.
Kelcie D WillisVirginia Commonwealth University, Department of Psychology, Richmond, Virginia.
Autumn LanoyeVirginia Commonwealth University, School of Medicine Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Richmond, Virginia.
Virginia Commonwealth University · USUniversity Health Network · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA diagnosis of cancer may increase mortality salience and provoke death-related distress. Primary brain tumor (PBT) patients may be at particular risk for such distress given the certainty of tumor progression, lack of curative treatments, and poor survival rates. This study is the first to examine the prevalence of death-related distress and its correlates in PBT patients.

methodsAdult PBT patients (N = 105) enrolled in this cross-sectional study and completed the Death Distress Scale (subscales: Death Depression, Death Anxiety, Death Obsession), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, and Patient Health Questionnaire-9. Prevalence and predictors of death-related distress, and the relationships of demographic variables to clusters of distress, were explored.

resultsThe majority of PBT patients endorsed clinically significant death-related distress in at least one domain. Death anxiety was endorsed by 81%, death depression by 12.5%, and death obsession by 10.5%. Generalized anxiety was the only factor associated with global death-related distress. Cluster analysis yielded 4 profiles: global distress, emotional distress, resilience, and existential distress. Participants in the resilience cluster were significantly further out from diagnosis than those in the existential distress cluster. There were no differences in cluster membership based on age, sex, or tumor grade.

conclusionsPBT patients appear to have a high prevalence of death-related distress, particularly death anxiety. Further, 4 distinct profiles of distress were identified, supporting the need for tailored approaches to addressing death-related distress. A shift in clusters of distress based on time since diagnosis also suggest the need for future longitudinal assessment.

Indexed as

death anxietydeath-related distressneuro-oncologyprimary brain tumorquality of life

Identifiers

PMID33014390
PMCPMC7516120
OpenAlexW3015843997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.