ArticleMolecular and clinical oncology2020
Implementation of repeat biopsy and detection of cancer after a diagnosis of atypical small acinar proliferation of the prostate.
Article in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ten-year follow-up of atypical small acinar hyperplasia cases diagnosed by initial prostate biopsy.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Expression of nectin-4 in prostate cancer.Northern clinics of Istanbul · 2023Article
- Clinical strategy of repeat biopsy in patients with atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP).Scientific reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Current guidelines recommend a repeat biopsy within 3-6 months after an initial diagnosis of atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP) due to the high incidence of cancer detection on repeat biopsy. The current study sought to investigate practice patterns after a diagnosis of ASAP in a real-world setting and examine the clinicopathological outcomes of repeat biopsy. The departmental database of the Hyogo Prefectural Nishinomiya Hospital identified 97 of 1,218 patients with a diagnosis of ASAP on initial biopsy from 2011 to 2016. Clinical and pathological data were retrospectively analyzed. Of the 97 patients, 34 (35.1%) underwent a repeat biopsy. Patients with a repeat biopsy had a significantly higher prostate-specific antigen (PSA) velocity and shorter PSA doubling time than patients without a repeat biopsy (P=0.0002), and of these 34 patients with a repeat biopsy, 16 (47.1%) were diagnosed as having cancer. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that a small prostate (P=0.0250) and advanced age (P=0.0297) were associated with cancer detection on repeat biopsy. Of the 16 cancers identified, 13 (81.6%) were diagnosed with a Gleason score >6. The results indicated that the implementation of a repeat biopsy for patients with ASAP could be affected by clinical characteristics in real-world settings, despite the current recommendation of guidelines endorsing immediate repeat biopsy. Prostate volume and age would aid in the decision-making process to perform repeat biopsy in patients with high PSA velocity and short PSA doubling time after a diagnosis of ASAP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.