ArticleClinics and practice2020
Therapy results of pericallosal aneurysms: A retrospective unicenter study.
Article in Clinics and practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Microsurgical clipping versus endovascular therapy for distal anterior cerebral artery aneurysms: A meta-analysis of double-armed comparative studies.Neurosurgical review · 2026Pooled it
- Pericallosal artery aneurysms: an evidence-based analysis of clinical presentations, therapeutic approaches, and outcome.Neurosurgical review · 2025Review
- Mirror Aneurysms of the Pericallosal Artery Clipped During a Single Surgical Procedure: Case Report and Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Sex differences in the correlation between white matter hyperintensity and 3-month outcome in acute stroke patients.Heliyon · 2024Article
- A case report of pericallosal aneurysm successfully treated with flow diverter stents.Radiology case reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This retrospective study aims to compare treatment results of ruptured and unruptured pericallosal artery aneurysms (PAAs) regarding patient outcome and aneurysm recurrence after endovascular treatment (EVT) and neurosurgical treatment (NT). A total of 67 patients with PAA were admitted to our hospital, 44 patients with subarachnoidal hemorrhage (SAH) due to a ruptured PAA and 23 patients with unruptured PAA. The radiographic features of PAA were collected from pre-treatment digital subtraction angiography. In addition, demographic, clinical and radiographic parameters of all patients were recorded. Outcome was measured based on the modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 6 months after admission (favorable mRS score, 0-2
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.