ArticleDisease markers2020
Digital PCR for the Analysis of
Article in Disease markers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring copy number alterations (CNAs) to gain new insight into SCLC heterogeneity.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Mortality Data Collection by Local Authorities Compared to a Cancer Registry.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2026Observational
- Understanding and Overcoming Osteosarcoma Heterogeneity.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Article
- Early reappearance of intraclonal proliferative subpopulations in ibrutinib-resistant chronic lymphocytic leukemia.Leukemia · 2024Article
- Digital PCR for Single-Cell Analysis.Biosensors · 2024Review
- Assessment of MYC and TERT copy number variations in lung cancer using digital PCR.BMC research notes · 2023Article
- Evaluate the Prognosis ofTechnology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background
resultsThe results of the
conclusionThe results of the study show that dPCR is an accurate and reliable method for the determination of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.