ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2020
A neuro-inspired general framework for the evolution of stochastic dynamical systems: Cellular automata, random Boolean networks and echo state networks towards criticality.
Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The connectivity degree controls the difficulty in reservoir design of random boolean networks.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2024Article
- Complex Dynamics of Noise-Perturbed Excitatory-Inhibitory Neural Networks With Intra-Correlative and Inter-Independent Connections.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- Criticality-Driven Evolution of Adaptable Morphologies of Voxel-Based Soft-Robots.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although deep learning has recently increased in popularity, it suffers from various problems including high computational complexity, energy greedy computation, and lack of scalability, to mention a few. In this paper, we investigate an alternative brain-inspired method for data analysis that circumvents the deep learning drawbacks by taking the actual dynamical behavior of biological neural networks into account. For this purpose, we develop a general framework for dynamical systems that can evolve and model a variety of substrates that possess computational capacity. Therefore, dynamical systems can be exploited in the reservoir computing paradigm, i.e., an untrained recurrent nonlinear network with a trained linear readout layer. Moreover, our general framework, called EvoDynamic, is based on an optimized deep neural network library. Hence, generalization and performance can be balanced. The EvoDynamic framework contains three kinds of dynamical systems already implemented, namely cellular automata, random Boolean networks, and echo state networks. The evolution of such systems towards a dynamical behavior, called criticality, is investigated because systems with such behavior may be better suited to do useful computation. The implemented dynamical systems are stochastic and their evolution with genetic algorithm mutates their update rules or network initialization. The obtained results are promising and demonstrate that criticality is achieved. In addition to the presented results, our framework can also be utilized to evolve the dynamical systems connectivity, update and learning rules to improve the quality of the reservoir used for solving computational tasks and physical substrate modeling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.