ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2020
German-Wide Interlaboratory Study Compares Consistency, Accuracy and Reproducibility of Whole-Genome Short Read Sequencing.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Illumina MiSeq and iSeq platforms yield comparable results for viral genomic sequencing.Journal of virological methods · 2025Article
- The A, B, C, D's of replicative DNA polymerase fidelity: utilizing high-throughput single-molecule sequencing to understand the molecular basis for DNA polymerase accuracy.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Compatibility of whole-genome sequencing data from Illumina and Ion Torrent technologies in genome comparison analysis ofMicrobial genomics · 2025Article
- An inter-laboratory study characterizes the impact of bioinformatic approaches on genome-based cluster detection for foodborne bacterial pathogens.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Evaluation of nationwide analysis surveillance for methicillin-resistantMicrobial genomics · 2025Article
- Genotyping of European Toxoplasma gondii strains by a new high-resolution next-generation sequencing-based method.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2024Article
- Impact of wet-lab protocols on quality of whole-genome short-read sequences from foodborne microbial pathogens.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Whole-Genome Sequence Comparisons ofMicroorganisms · 2022Article
- In vitro and in silico parameters for precise cgMLST typing of Listeria monocytogenes.BMC genomics · 2022Article
- Applications of next generation sequencing in the screening and diagnosis of thalassemia: A mini-review.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Review
- The efficiency of Nextera XT tagmentation depends on G and C bases in the binding motif leading to uneven coverage in bacterial species with low and neutral GC-content.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- High-throughput sequencing technologies in the detection of livestock pathogens, diagnosis, and zoonotic surveillance.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Review
- Taxonomic Evaluation of theMicroorganisms · 2021Article
- Uncovering Diagnostic Value of Mitogenome for Identification of Cryptic SpeciesFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Decentralized Investigation of Bacterial Outbreaks Based on Hashed cgMLST.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Reply to Li et al., "GC Content-Associated Sequencing Bias Caused by Library Preparation Method May Infrequently AffectApplied and environmental microbiology · 2020Article
- German-Wide Interlaboratory Study Compares Consistency, Accuracy and Reproducibility of Whole-Genome Short Read Sequencing.Frontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We compared the consistency, accuracy and reproducibility of next-generation short read sequencing between ten laboratories involved in food safety (research institutes, state laboratories, universities and companies) from Germany and Austria. Participants were asked to sequence six DNA samples of three bacterial species (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.